> From: hannes.wallnoe...@oracle.com
> To: srinivas.d...@oracle.com
> Cc: nashorn-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 7:33:18 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata,
> Mumbai, New Delhi
> Subject: Re: RFR:8147076(LinkerCallSite.ARGLIMIT is used incorrectly)
>
> Hi Sri
, Kolkata,
Mumbai, New Delhi
Subject: Re: RFR:8147076(LinkerCallSite.ARGLIMIT is used incorrectly)
Hi Srini,
a few notes:
- Shouldn’t the new test include an invocation with > ARGLIMIT double
arguments to test it works?
- No need to use Number(1.1), a number with a fractional part will res
> Cc: nashorn-dev@openjdk.java.net
> Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 7:33:18 PM GMT +05:30 Chennai, Kolkata,
> Mumbai, New Delhi
> Subject: Re: RFR:8147076(LinkerCallSite.ARGLIMIT is used incorrectly)
>
> Hi Srini,
>
> a few notes:
>
> - Shouldn’t the new test in
Hi Hannes,
Thank you for the comments
-Modified test case already covers both > ARGLIMIT and ARGLIMIT double
arguments to test it works?
- No need to use Number(1.1), a number with a fractional part will result in a
double.
- I assume eval() in the test is to force this-object and callee
Hi Srini,
a few notes:
- Shouldn’t the new test include an invocation with > ARGLIMIT double
arguments to test it works?
- No need to use Number(1.1), a number with a fractional part will result in a
double.
- I assume eval() in the test is to force this-object and callee to be sent,
Hi,
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sdama/8147076/webrev.00/
for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147076
Regards,
Srinivas
