File a separate to track jdk.dynalink permissions:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145868
Adjusted test comments that Hannes mentioned and pushing changes in
webrev @ http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8145750/webrev.01/
Thanks
-Sundar
On 12/20/2015 9:53 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/12/2015 12:55, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
May be, not. But I tried giving only sun.reflect package access --
didn't work. There are a few doPrivileged blocks in dynalink code as
well. This needs further analysis.
But dynalink code was part of nashorn and so was getting
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8145750/webrev.00/ for
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145750
Adding missing permissions for jdk.dynalink module. Note that it used to
be part of jdk.scripting.nashorn module in the past and therefore got
AllPermission.
Thanks,
On 18/12/2015 12:23, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8145750/webrev.00/
for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8145750
Adding missing permissions for jdk.dynalink module. Note that it used
to be part of jdk.scripting.nashorn module
Looks good. Some of the new test scripts have an incomplete @summary
line, e.g. jjs-strictTest.sh:
# @summary Test that output of 'jjs -strict'
Hannes
Am 2015-12-18 um 13:23 schrieb Sundararajan Athijegannathan:
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8145750/webrev.00/
for
On 12/18/2015 07:55 AM, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
inline comments below..
On 12/18/2015 6:22 PM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 18/12/2015 12:23, Sundararajan Athijegannathan wrote:
Please review http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sundar/8145750/webrev.00/
for
