Oh, good one. Yes, I think that’ll do. It engages Nashorn’s built-in linker
chain to find an appropriate conversion.
Attila.
> On 2018. Apr 4., at 19:28, Paulo Lopes wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've worked around it by using:
>
>
> ScriptUtils.convert(obj, Map.class)
>
>
>
Hi,
I've worked around it by using:
ScriptUtils.convert(obj, Map.class)
When ever I needed to get a script object as a map or replacing the class with
List.class when I need a list...
Is that a safe way to do it?
Original Message
From: szege...@gmail.com
Sent: April 4, 2018 7:21 PM
Sorry for an awfully late response, but hope it might still help:
Java.asJSONCompatible delegates on the Java side to
jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.wrapAsJSONCompatible. It’s part of Nashorn’s
supported public API, so it should be fine for you to call it.
I’m actually wondering how useful is that
Hi,
Dynalink and its pluggable linkers are independent of Nashorn. If you
want to access the current engine, you've to arrange to pass it.
Thanks,
-Sundar
On 16/03/18, 12:32 AM, Paulo Lopes wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing a guarded linker to allow custom casting from JSObject to Vertx
custom types.