[Neo4j] Re: Any plans for an optional schema?

2014-07-17 Thread Jason Gillman Jr.
, 2014 4:28:54 PM UTC-4, Jason Gillman Jr. wrote: I was just wondering if the ability to utilize a schema of sorts was on the road map. When I say schema, I'm thinking more along the lines of relational constraints. Let's use the following simple example. We have the following types

[Neo4j] Any plans for an optional schema?

2014-07-16 Thread Jason Gillman Jr.
I was just wondering if the ability to utilize a schema of sorts was on the road map. When I say schema, I'm thinking more along the lines of relational constraints. Let's use the following simple example. We have the following types of entities represented by node labels (:`Server`)

[Neo4j] Re: Feature request: 'virtual' relationships in result sets

2014-07-14 Thread Jason Gillman Jr.
I'm guessing you just want some indication that there's a path (or no path) between N1 and N2? I guess a bit more context would help to determine what you're trying to do exactly - what's the use case? On Monday, July 14, 2014 1:01:13 AM UTC-4, Mars Agliullin wrote: Hello, group I have a

[Neo4j] What are the plans for mixed-type arrays

2014-07-09 Thread Jason Gillman Jr.
Hello! I was just wondering what, if any, plans there are in regard to mixed-type arrays for properties. Thanks! -Jason -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Neo4j group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email

Re: [Neo4j] What are the plans for mixed-type arrays

2014-07-09 Thread Jason Gillman Jr.
, nested documents) but not in the close future. What do you want to do? Michael On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Jason Gillman Jr. mackdad...@gmail.com javascript: wrote: Hello! I was just wondering what, if any, plans there are in regard to mixed-type arrays for properties. Thanks