Oula
I think you should have a quick conversation with Karl, who manages our
operation in Scandinavia. There's actually a meetup in Helsinki next week
(http://www.meetup.com/Helsinki-Neo4j-Meetup/) so maybe you guys could meet
there?
Rik
On Friday, August 15, 2014 1:24:06 PM UTC+2, Oula
Hi Oula. Let me cover each of your questions separately. Sorry for the
delayed reply as I've been traveling all week:
*Question:* *Evaluating Neo4j's scalability isn't possible with Community
Edition?*
*Answer:* That’s generally true. Neo4j Community is just as fast for single
queries. But
On 08/17/2014 03:52 AM, philip.rat...@neotechnology.com wrote:
*Question:* /Evaluating Neo4j's scalability isn't possible with
Community Edition?/
*Answer:* That’s generally true. Neo4j Community is just as fast for
single queries. But for large databases with highly concurrent
workload,
Thanks a lot Craig for your help. The query is working fine now. But when I
142 nodes using the method you suggested I can see a total of 290 nodes in
DB. Can I safely assume that all these are related to indexing of R-TREE
and none of then are redundant as in previous case?
On Tuesday, 12
Thanks a lot Craig for your help. The query is working fine now. But when I
load 142 nodes using the method you suggested I can see a total of 290
nodes in DB. Can I safely assume that all these are related to indexing of
R-TREE and none of then are redundant as in previous case?
On Tuesday,
I also need one more help Craig. I wish to query dynamically say I want to
find all nodes which are within a span of 10KM. Something like 'n,m where
nm and withinDistance:[n.lat, n.lon, 10.0]'. I want to have distinct
results - same pair (in any order) should not appear again in results. I
Excellent thank you. I hadn't considered that. I has been trying to get the web
console up. Is that also possible?
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2014, at 1:42, Michael Hunger michael.hun...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
You mean the neo4j-shell?
Pass enable_remote_shell=true
As config to
That would mean you have to start the server infrastructure from an
embedded instance. Possible, but I would not advise it - too much overhead,
just expose normal cypher via an HTML endpoint?
/peter
G: neubauer.peter
S: peter.neubauer
P: +46 704 106975
L:
It means the enterprise lock manager copes better with higher contention. In
other words, it performs better than the community lock manager.
--
Chris Vest
System Engineer, Neo Technology
[ skype: mr.chrisvest, twitter: chvest ]
On 17 Aug 2014, at 14:16, Alan Robertson al...@unix.sh wrote:
Got it. Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 17, 2014, at 10:59, Peter Neubauer pe...@mapillary.com wrote:
That would mean you have to start the server infrastructure from an embedded
instance. Possible, but I would not advise it - too much overhead, just
expose normal cypher via an HTML
Craig, Please reply. Thanks.
On Tuesday, 12 August 2014 20:00:01 UTC+5:30, Mohana Krishna wrote:
Hello,
I have loaded the spatial data in the attached file using REST API script
(which is also attached). The nodes are created and I can visualize them on
DB.
However when I perform the
Right. It definitely does not mean data corruption; just less (or more)
waiting.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 5:22 PM, Chris Vest chris.v...@neotechnology.com
wrote:
It means the enterprise lock manager copes better with higher contention.
In other words, it performs better than the community lock
Howdy,
Setup:
neo4j 2.1.2
spatial plugin: neo4j-spatial-0.12
I'm trying to query on spatial index that I created via php, the cypher
query works in a browser when I run neo4j standalone eg:
START n = node:geo_main('withinDistance:[41.061878,-73.79705, 2.2]') where
n.city = white plains
Fill kinda stupid, I did not include the jars from neo4j spatial.
Thanks!
On Sunday, August 17, 2014 8:10:41 PM UTC-4, Pavel wrote:
Howdy,
Setup:
neo4j 2.1.2
spatial plugin: neo4j-spatial-0.12
I'm trying to query on spatial index that I created via php, the cypher
query works in a
14 matches
Mail list logo
