When all of the cathodes in a single tube lose large patches of coverage in a
short period of time, it still seems that it would be a failure of the gas
mixture. Over driving the cathodes for a period of time would cause an
eventual loss of brightness but it should cause variations among
Could the photocoupler at HC2 be the culprit at all? When you change the
tubes, is the brightness of the IN14 at that position the same as the rest?
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 8:10 PM, gregebert wrote:
> Since it's multiplexed, it might be worth comparing the 'on' time of
Since it's multiplexed, it might be worth comparing the 'on' time of each
tube (I'm guessing it's H2 on the schematic ?). You'll need a scope. Maybe
there is a quirk in the controller firmware that leaves this particular
tube on longer ?? There's also a slight difference in the circuit around
Thanks, Jon!
BTW - does anyone know of a source for connectors for these, or how to make
one?
On Tuesday, August 16, 2016 at 1:44:55 PM UTC-5, Jon wrote:
>
> Care to share pictures / schematics with the rest of the list?
>>
>> I have some of those displays (Vishay-branded) and would like to
Thanks Jon!
/Martin
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"neonixie-l" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to neonixie-l+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send an email to
Nice!
Could it be that you have a timing issue with the guides not being totally
"off" when you do the reset?
Or that the reset does not load the cathode enough so that the glow steps
to a lower potential, being K9? You can also check what happens if you
exchange the guides, then it should
Well, those who know me, know that I have attraction to dekatrons. Here's
some of my latest tinkering. A long while back I designed a 4000 CMOS base
pendulum circuit. It used a 4017 counter, and a 4013 flip-flop. I revisited
that circuit, and came up with one that just uses on 4518 dual
Thanks for the response Nick, check out the pics I posted in the latest
comment. Let me know if you want to see a different angle, LED light
pollution got in the way a bit too..
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 8:37:52 PM UTC-7, Pramanicin wrote:
>
> Brando, that sucks. What make and model of
Nick-
Google Drive, while not necessarily perfect, does offer the ability to
restrict access to specific people. Set up this way, it would not allow
anyone else with the link to use it. You can also set view/edit access at
the individual level. Hope that helps...
Best,
Dylan
On Aug 16, 2016
Not really - the link will leak and the rights are the same for all uses of
the link, there is no user authorisation or permissioning control.
Nick
On Tuesday, 16 August 2016 12:18:43 UTC+1, Roddy Scott wrote:
>
> If the link is only available to members then would that not suffice?
>
If the link is only available to members then would that not suffice?
Suscriber only access?
Just a thought.
On Monday, August 15, 2016 at 2:49:21 PM UTC+1, Nick wrote:
>
> Making it public and a direct link doesn't address the access requirements
> mentioned above - anybody with the link
Brando: I meant to say that all of the numerals inside of a single IN-18 tube
in the H[X]:MM:SS position did the same thing as you described. My cathodes in
the bad tube faded out from the top over a period of about a week or less and
the failure began with little warning after operating
12 matches
Mail list logo