[neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-21 Thread Jens Boos
Hmm sorry I was a bit slow on responses. I am a little confused about all these codes, basically I have never heard of these before, and I have no clue where to search for them. As I understand it, these codes were used to indicate in which equipment the respective component (here: our Inditron)

[neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-17 Thread Accutron
In all likelihood, the GI-10 does not have an anode because they had not yet managed to invent an anode configuration which did not infringe on the Boswau patent or the Northrop patent or any of the other early gas discharge patents. The Burroughs Nixie is the earliest known production tube with a

[neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-14 Thread Jens Boos
Hi Steve, I think Micah agreed on giving the Wikipedia article another shot. I will be writing an article on this soon, and I will include our version as well as the other version. But I will point out that the other theory needs historical proof and is thus merely conjecture for now. I am just

[neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-13 Thread Steve Scorn
As a complete and utter novice reading this thread; there is some seriously great knowledge, and true expert opinion bouncing back and forth. As a group, can we not overcome the he-said-she-said differences and capture this to Wikipedia? From the perspective of a novice, Wikipedia's voice speaks

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-10 Thread jb-electronics
I'm not even going to entertain the possibility of Telefunken Nixies in the 1940s. You might as well tell me the Germans developed a functional atomic bomb in the 1930s but never patented it or used it because they didn't want to infringe on US atomic bomb patents that would later be filed in

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread Unmitigated Fool
Micah, You should edit the article so it's accurate. That's how a Wiki should work. Accutron wrote: The Wikipedia Nixie tube page is horrible and wrong on many issues, and should be ignored by all thinking individuals. Micah Mabelitini http://www.decadecounter.com/ -- You

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread jb-electronics
Hello Micah, National Union released the Inditron in 1954. Do you have an add or a press release for that? That would be amazing. I only have the snippet from Popular Science, 1954, that you also have on your VTA website. Haydu was bought by Burroughs in 1954. OK, that is also what I

[neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread Accutron
On Nov 9, 11:21 am, jb-electronics webmas...@jb-electronics.de wrote: Hello Micah, (snipped) The patent, official datasheet and press release for the GI-10 Inditron are all dated 1954. Here's the original datasheet, dated May 1954... http://www.decadecounter.com/vta/pict5/inditrongi10.jpg The

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread jb-electronics
Hello Micah, The patent, official datasheet and press release for the GI-10 Inditron are all dated 1954. Here's the original datasheet, dated May 1954... How embarassing - I never noticed the small issued May 1954, even though I have had this datasheet a long time. Good that this is a

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread jb-electronics
Hello again, Here are the three early advertisements I know about. They were published in Electronics magazine between May and December 1955... [...] Oh yes, the article from Mr Ciardiello, see it here: http://www.radiomuseum.org/forum/nixie_and_trochotron_haydu_vs_burroughs.html How do

[neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread Accutron
On Nov 9, 2:25 pm, David Forbes dfor...@dakotacom.net wrote: Thanks for the ad scans. They are historically interesting. Have you ever seen a real Vari-Count module? I've never seen anything made by Haydu in person, other than the orange-label 6700. I've never even seen a photo of a

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread jb-electronics
Hello, [...] Mr. Ciardiello had [...] had regurgitated the same incorrect Haydu origin mantra. He subsequently edited the content of this article enough that it is vaguely-not- incorrect, but he doesn't actually admit that I was right all along. The Haydu Vs. Burroughs article is basically

[neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread Accutron
On Nov 9, 2:25 pm, David Forbes dfor...@dakotacom.net wrote: By the way, I have a Haydu Brothers box with a defective 6700 tube in it. It has little stickers that say, A subsidiary of Burroughs Corp. stuck on every side of the box. Naturally, it was a gift from Tom Jennings. It includes a

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread David Forbes
On 11/9/2010 1:49 PM, Accutron wrote: On Nov 9, 2:25 pm, David Forbesdfor...@dakotacom.net wrote: By the way, I have a Haydu Brothers box with a defective 6700 tube in it. It has little stickers that say, A subsidiary of Burroughs Corp. stuck on every side of the box. Naturally, it was a gift

Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Nixie Tube History - help needed

2010-11-09 Thread jb-electronics
Okay, I suppose I'll give it a shot. Great news. Jens: on the subject of Inditrons in the 1940s, that's just wrong. We were once given bad information as to the Inditron's age, and had a date estimate of 1940s up on our site for some time. We have since corrected that information, but it's