My initial thought was to go for clear. I am only trying to find out whether there may be any benefit or perceived advantage in using the tints. I'll post results of testing.Sent from my Huawei phone Original Message Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspexFrom: N
What’s wrong with clear? Why hide the ZM1350? The old instruments that used
these had filters etc and I think that’s a shame as you don’t get to see the
inner ‘workings’.just my 2 cents:-)
Cheers,
Nick
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 11, 2019, at 08:37, Richard Scales wrote:
>
>
> Th
Thank you all for your feedback.
I have ordered up some samples of translucent Orange and Florescent Orange
(whatever that is) and will perform some tests. If I can get my act
together I'll post pictures here.
On Friday, 11 October 2019 07:28:24 UTC+1, Richard Scales wrote:
>
> I have a project
enhancement of -in that time weak lighting-
LED-displays
eric
Van: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com [mailto:neonixie-l@googlegroups.com] Namens
newxito
Verzonden: vrijdag 11 oktober 2019 11:09
Aan: neonixie-l
Onderwerp: [neonixie-l] Re: Putting ZM1350 behind perspex
I've done a few tests i
I've done a few tests in the past. With the acrylic that I got, the result
was as follow:
translucent red: converts the orange glow to red, reduces contrast and
brightness
translucent orange: keeps the orange glow, slightly improves contrast,
maintains brightness
translucent brown: keeps t
