Hi Christoph,
> On 9 Jan 2017, at 05:56, Langer, Christoph wrote:
>
> Ping: Please review this backport to JDK8.
>
> From: Langer, Christoph
> Sent: Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2016 10:37
> To: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; jdk8u-...@openjdk.java.net
> Subject: [8u-dev]:
Hi Christoph,
Code change looks good to me, but i am not an official reviewer.
Thanks,
Vyom
On Monday 09 January 2017 11:26 AM, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Ping: Please review this backport to JDK8.
*From:*Langer, Christoph
*Sent:* Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2016 10:37
*To:*
Ping: Please review this backport to JDK8.
From: Langer, Christoph
Sent: Donnerstag, 29. Dezember 2016 10:37
To: net-dev@openjdk.java.net; jdk8u-...@openjdk.java.net
Subject: [8u-dev]: Request for Review and Approval: 8075484:
SocketInputStream.socketRead0 can hang even with soTimeout set
Hi,
Hi Vyom,
generally, I think it is a good idea to have a look at NET_GetCurrentTime vs.
JVM_CurrentTimeMillis again.
However, NET_GetCurrentTime is self-contained and does not need arguments
whereas JVM_CurrentTimeMillis needs a JNI env pointer. And since
NET_GetCurrentTime is called from
Hi Christoph,
As this is not direct backport what about using the existing function
"JVM_CurrentTimeMillis(env, 0);" instead of "NET_GetCurrentTime() ".
When i did this code change i did not know that we already have this.If
you use the existing one then you can simply remove the