On 07/03/18 08:36, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Hi Chris,
The JDK HTTP Client has:
`HttpRequest.Builder::method(String method, BodyPublisher publisher)`
,so it is currently possible to use the `PATCH` method.
Is `PATCH` sufficiently popular to warrant its own self-named
method in the request
Hi Chris,
> The JDK HTTP Client has:
> `HttpRequest.Builder::method(String method, BodyPublisher publisher)`
>
> ,so it is currently possible to use the `PATCH` method.
>
> Is `PATCH` sufficiently popular to warrant its own self-named
> method in the request builder?
I don't know how popular
I don't have any opinion on the matter, but a datapoint to the popularity
of PATCH is its use in the GitHub API:
https://developer.github.com/v3/
GitHub is often looked to as a gold standard for how to write a REST API,
so if they do it, it's likely that many others do too.
On 7 March 2018 at
Hi Andrej,
On 02/03/18 08:28, Andrej Golovnin wrote:
Hi all,
it would be nice if could add PATCH
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789) to the list of the supported
...
- and one for the HTTP Client branch in the JDK sandbox repository
which adds PATCH to the HttpRequest builder:
Hi all,
it would be nice if could add PATCH
(https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5789) to the list of the supported
HTTP methods in the HttpURLConnection class.
I have attached two patches:
- one for the HttpURLConnection class:
java_net_HttpURLConnection_PATCH_method.diff
- and one for the HTTP
