Please see bug #819154 (more than one exec is a problem).
The same problem for pass_persist.
If the attached patch is applied, then multiple "pass_persist"
seem to work correctly.
Is there _significant_ downside to incorporating this patch
before the 5.1.2 release ?
e.g., will it break existing
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:06:57 -0700, "David T. Perkins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
David> I hope and wish that another mechanism be developed. My feeling
David> is that the current one is over complex, and really doesn't do
David> the job. One may say that it is a standard. But, if it is not
HI,
I hope and wish that another mechanism be developed. My feeling is
that the current one is over complex, and really doesn't do the job.
One may say that it is a standard. But, if it is not used, except
for trivial configurations, why implement it?
At 03:38 PM 6/30/2004 -0700, Wes Hardaker wro
> On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 12:23:54 -0400, "Pedot, Wolfgang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Wolfgang> I am using create_trap_session, snmp_set_var_objid,
Wolfgang> snmp_set_var_value and send_enterprise_trap_vars to generate
Wolfgang> and send my traps (is this a clean way?).
Wolfgang> create_trap_sessi
> On Tue, 22 Jun 2004 14:51:08 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Dave> Note that all notifications will be sent to all destinations.
Dave> The agent does not (currently) support notification filtering.
E
Ok, it happened again. I hit a deadline, had to travel for a week (to
the deadline) and got lost in a quagmire of mail that resulted from
not reading it for a while...
Where are we with respect to the patches being worked on for 5.1.2?
Can I release a .pre3 or are we at .rc1 stage now? Let me k
> On Thu, 24 Jun 2004 17:44:13 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Thomas> -Coders,
Thomas> AFAICS the engineIDType still defaults to the custom (aka
Thomas> proprietary) ENGINEID_TYPE_UCD_RND (128) and the enterprise ID
Thomas> in the engineID is still UCD (2021=0x07e5) instead of
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2004 16:51:29 -0400, Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
DS> I think we need some input on this one
Robert> Agreed...
[still in catch-up mode]
1) I agree its needed. I even have a mail message from about 5 years
ago that talked about scanning the
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 11:25:38 +0200 (CEST), jeff x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
jeff> So, there will be be no more vacm checking on the
jeff> server. Does someone could give me some information,
jeff> such as the name of the "vacm-access-cheking
jeff> procedure" and some other advices that could
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:08:25 -0400, Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
DS> Robert> it stands at 2-1.
DS>
DS> Yes - I'm getting used to that :-(
Robert> Well, we've all been there. You just need to come work for us,
Robert> and then together we can rule the world! Mwuuuh
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:12:11 +0200 (CEST), Hugo Monteiro Cacote <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Hugo> pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.96.255.2.0 /tmp/a/test
Try registering it at .1.3.6.1.4.1.96.255.2 instead...
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta
---
This SF.N
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 13:11:36 -0400, Robert Story (Coders) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Robert> Not right now, but it *should* in the immediate future, and
Robert> *will* before 5.2.0 goes out...
Good by me.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta
-
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:55:25 -0700 Fong wrote:
FT> Does this bug get fixed?
Not yet.
FT> I checked site, it indicates that the fix by commenting out
FT> asp->pdu->variables = NULL; in function save_set_cache() in
FT> agent/snmp_agent.c will cause double free (crash) problem. I wonder if
FT> anyb
Vincenzo Cicerone wrote:
>Hi
>I've installed the win32 binary.
>I've installed ActiveState Perl and the SNMP Perl module.
>I've successfully started the snmpd.exe, it correctly reply to my SNMP
>Manager.
Very well.
>
>Now I've problems with the windows project "win32.dsw". I've to extend
>the ag
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:52:23 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> Having a set of handlers called "in sequence" is a perfectly reasonable
DS> alternative model. I'm unconvinced as to whether it's necessarily
DS> better than the current "pipeline" model, but it's certainly not a
DS> poor choice.
I'm not sure I
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:30:28 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> Hmmm. Maybe I've misunderstood what you meant by
DS>"enable the new modules, and exclude the others"
DS> I thought that meant include the ipNetToPhysicalTable, etc,
DS> but not the older ones (such as atTable). Was that wrong?
No,that
Does this bug get fixed?
I checked site, it indicates that the fix by commenting out asp->pdu->variables =
NULL; in function save_set_cache() in agent/snmp_agent.c will cause double free
(crash) problem. I wonder if anybody has tried this fix and got crash? Anybody has the
fix for both (neith
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:52:20 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> Robert> Well, technically, the handler had to have requested the cache in
DS> Robert> the first place, so it could have save the cache pointer when it
DS> Robert> created it
DS>
DS> Sort of.
DS> The lower level code typically creates a normal hand
DS> Will the ipNetToPhysicalTable be included by default, or an optional
DS> module (to be configured in explicitly) ?
Robert> The current cvs is either/or. The --enable-mfd-rewrites would
Robert> enable the new modules, and exclude the others.
DS> And the default is to use the traditional code -
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 15:52:33 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> DS> My gut reaction is to wait [...]
DS>
DS> Robert> Sounds reasonable. The only reason I asked is that we are rapidly
DS> Robert> approaching 5.2. So the question was, should we release the code
DS> Robert> with the wrong name.
DS>
DS> As long
DS> But the only reason that the cache needed to be linked with the reqinfo
DS> parameter was that this was the only way that lower handlers could get
DS> hold of it.
Robert> Well, technically, the handler had to have requested the cache in
Robert> the first place, so it could have save the cac
Hi
I've installed the win32 binary.
I've installed ActiveState Perl and the SNMP Perl module.
I've successfully started the snmpd.exe, it correctly reply to my SNMP
Manager.
Now I've problems with the windows project "win32.dsw". I've to extend
the agent!
It doesn't know the token "tempFilePatter
Robert> Replace 'eliminating the redundant loop' with 'eliminating an
Robert> unnecessary function call and reducing the stack depth.' (Have you
Robert> looked at a back trace from a low level handler? It's horrendous.)
No argument there!
Robert> I think that it's that it's a change from how
DS> Has the numeric OID actually changed?
Robert> Yep. It changed by one.
Oops - missed that.
DS> My gut reaction is to wait - stick with what you've got at the moment
DS> When this finally appears as an RFC, then *that's* the time to rename
DS> the implementation files, etc. Once it's
Dear all,
The snmpget is displaying some strange behaviour when using pass method
to extend the agent. I have a following line in my snmpd.conf file:
pass .1.3.6.1.4.1.96.255.2.0 /tmp/a/test
test is a tiny C-program that looks like this:
# cat test.c
int main() {
sleep(0);
printf(".1.3.6.
Huh? Wha? Oh!
I've been building fairly regularly on 2.6, 7 and 8 for sun4u and sun4m. I
haven't seen this in quite awhile so I assume it's fixed.
SN> 701992 - undefined symbol Route_Scan_Reload linking snmpd on Solaris
SN>
SN> If CVS main branch builds on Solaris 8,
SN> can this bug be close
Dave Shield wrote:
>>>Tested on 32-bit FreeBSD 4.9 and FreeBSD 5.2.1
>>>
>>>Apply this patch to fix these problems with IPV6-UDP-MIB and IPV6-TCP-MIB
>
>
>>P.S. It would be real nice if this made the cut for the
>>5.1.2 release . FreeBSD/NetBSD *with* all the trimmings. Ah!!
>
>
>I'd say that i
>> Tested on 32-bit FreeBSD 4.9 and FreeBSD 5.2.1
>>
>> Apply this patch to fix these problems with IPV6-UDP-MIB and IPV6-TCP-MIB
> P.S. It would be real nice if this made the cut for the
> 5.1.2 release . FreeBSD/NetBSD *with* all the trimmings. Ah!!
I'd say that if you want this in 5.1.2, t
Bruce> We're intending a major rewrite of the code for Solaris.
Not quite, Bruce.
You may be intending a major rewrite of the code for Solaris.
*I'm* intending a major rewrite of the code overall.
(It's been a while since I completely broke a large portion
of the agent, and I'm getting withdrawa
AC> can you help me to get latest ucd-snmp source code.
AC> I actually downloaded ucd-snmp 4.2.6 from source forge.net
AC> but unfortunately it is not compiling.
RS> That's due to the openssl folks changing their API. You can:
RS> 1) downgrade openssl
RS> 2) backport the changes to that file fro
31 matches
Mail list logo
