If you want to build libwrap support into net-snmp-5.2.1 under Solaris,
it doesn't make it past the configure test as it stands today. This is
due to the fact that Solaris has some unusual locations for some of it's
networking functions.
The basic idea is that you have to use the socket library
--- Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:32, Shobana Sampath wrote:
> > > Maybe the trap you are sending is not correct?
> In
> > > snmptrapd_handlers.c
>
> > As far as I can see the trapoid is the second
> varbind
> > from my SNMP server.
>
> It would probably be
> On Sat, 7 May 2005 02:04:46 +0200 (CEST), Bert Driehuis <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> said:
Bert> I'm finally sort of geared up again: I've successfully built both the
Bert> CVS HEAD and the 4.2.7rc1 on both FreeBSD 5.3 and 4.10, and committed
Bert> fixes as needed.
Excellent, thanks!
--
W
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 12:32, Shobana Sampath wrote:
> > Maybe the trap you are sending is not correct? In
> > snmptrapd_handlers.c
> As far as I can see the trapoid is the second varbind
> from my SNMP server.
It would probably be sensible to run "snmptrapd -d"
(or "snmptrapd -Ddump") and look
> Maybe the trap you are sending is not correct? In
> snmptrapd_handlers.c
> I see:
>
> /*
> * v2c/v3 notifications *should* have snmpTrapOID
> as the
> *second varbind, so we can go straight there.
> *But check, just to make sure
> */
>
> and if it can't find it, it logs: "Can
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On Tue
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 07:55, jigar contractor wrote:
> I want to get some more information about how to make
> SMUX process in Net- SNMP.
Well the most important thing to know about SMUX is that
it's obsolete. If you're developing subagents today,
then the most sensible starting point would be Ag
