Hi,
I just downloaded the last source tarbal. I noticed that
all CVS parts are not there, but many .cvsignore files are
still there. It would be nice if those are are stripped out.
Harrie
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software
Thomas Anders wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>I use this command in net-snmp: snmpget -v 2c -c private localhost
>>ssCpuRawUser.0
>>The answer is: UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0=No Such Object available on
>>this agent at this OID.
>>So ,what is the wrong? what should i do?
>
>
> It is pro
Hello guys,
I've created a table with mib2c.iterate.conf and implemented a data structure
that is a vector. When I use snmpget ( snmpget -v 2c -c public localhost:16100
gpsMonitorName.\"AMIR\" ) everything goes fine, it return exactly what I want.
When I try to use snmpgetnext ( snmpgetnext -v 2c -
Hey guys,
I'm writing my own snmp-agentx module for an app our company makes.
The module compiles fine, but when I load the module in our app I get this:
__load_resource: /usr/lib/libnetsnmphelpers.so.5: undefined symbol:
netsnmp_oid_stash_getnext_node
If I do:
strings /usr/lib/libnetsnmp
You need to look in the Host Resources MIB to get the CPU usage
information for a Windows server. Specifically, walk hrProcessorLoad to
find the load average for each CPU (assuming you have multiple CPUs
and/or HyperThreading enabled).
snmpwalk -v 1 -c public 192.168.1.1 hrProcessorLoad
HOST-RES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I use this command in net-snmp: snmpget -v 2c -c private localhost
> ssCpuRawUser.0
> The answer is: UCD-SNMP-MIB::ssCpuRawUser.0=No Such Object available on
> this agent at this OID.
> So ,what is the wrong? what should i do?
It is probably just not (yet) implemented
Title: Restarting the Net-SNMP agent in a threaded environment.
Hi all, I am evaluating porting the Net-SNMP (5.2.1) to a thread environment platform.
Only one thread of SNMP agent will run at the time.
However stopping and starting the SNMP agent is a requirement.
When I look at the code
Title: Message
Hi
Thankyou for ur cooperation . but this tutorial illustrates abt basics of snmp programming as i already have this tutorial. I need some advanced versions of SNMP Programming so that i learn more on this... plzz help me out..
Regards
Peeyush Bishnoi
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at
Thanks all for your warmhearted helps about snmpset, i have understood that command much better. As to the problem about "can't open udp point ", i have tried to shut down , unregister, register,and this error didn't occur any more. I felt strange. Now i have a problem about MRTG. I succeed in
Thanx for informaion, Now i am able to run the application. But I also
want to register the network element(NE) at manager side. Currently
there is no support for that. I only give UDP port 162, also the
simulator which I am using for sending the trap is configured by
giving manager's (trapd) addre
Robert Story wrote:
TA> Otherwise, shall we rather use an SONAME like "libnetsnmp.so.5."
TA> (e.g. libnetsnmp.so.5.2) and thus require applications to relink when
TA> upgrading from 5.x to 5.y?
I think that sounds like a good idea, as 5.x vs 5.n is usually a significant
release.
Makes us t
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 13:46:35 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> in all of our 5.x releases we set the SONAME of our libraries to:
TA>
TA> foo# objdump -x /path/to/net-snmp/lib/lib*.so | grep SONAME
TA>SONAME libnetsnmp.so.5
TA>
TA> i.e. only put the *major* version (5) in. Are we really intending t
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 07:06:35 +0100 (BST) saifulla wrote:
SMA> Can it not be in _asn_parse_length_check()? If we do
SMA> it there, it would be better place, i guess. Because we
SMA> can avoid unnecessary while loop, if we do it there.
No, for several reasons. One, that function is used by almost al
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 09:30:36 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> [...] even more unfortunate
DS> that I didn't investigate the current code more fully before
DS> responding. Sorry for the confusion.
We're supposed to investigate the code before responding? Aw man, now I'll
never get anything done! :-P
--
Rob
Robert Story wrote:
> TA> > I'm a little concerned that Thomas seems to think this is already fixed,
> TA> > but Dave has checked in a fix. I tend to avoid the v3 stuff when I can,
> TA> > so I just want to see if some double checking is called for?
> TA>
> TA> I'm referring to Wes' fixes discuss
15 matches
Mail list logo
