hai,
>
> madanagopal> If a SET request is pending in the agent, what other
> madanagopal> requests will be put on hold until that SET request is
> madanagopal> processed? Is it that requests for oids handled by
> madanagopal> handlers different from the one for that SET request will
> madanagopal
Hi,
Net-SNMP-5.2.1.2, OS-linux
Is it correct, that there is no net-snmp
implementation of EtherLike-MIB for linux?
Are there any plans to add it?
Sincerely,
Robert Iakobashvili - NAVIGARE NECESSE EST
coroberti at gmail dot com
--
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:05:49 -0700, "Fong Tsui" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Fong> When I enable v3 trap, I set the following in snmpd.conf
Fong> trapsess -v 3 -e 0x0102030405 -u myuser -l authNoPriv -a MD5 -A
Fong> 123456789 localhost:162
Fong> It works fine. But I wonder the password is hum
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:52:41 +0530 (IST), madanagopal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
madanagopal> If a SET request is pending in the agent, what other
madanagopal> requests will be put on hold until that SET request is
madanagopal> processed? Is it that requests for oids handled by
madanag
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 08:54:24 +0800, livia xie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
livia> I want to manage a group of network devices through a proxy
livia> agent on the base of net-snmp. But now I don't know how to
livia> start and what to do. Could anyone give me some advice? Is
livia> there any API
Fong Tsui wrote:
When I enable v3 trap, I set the following in snmpd.conf
trapsess -v 3 -e 0x0102030405 -u myuser -l authNoPriv -a MD5 -A
123456789 localhost:162
It works fine. But I wonder the password is human readable? Is there
security concern?
Adjust the snmpd.conf file permissions so t
Dave Shield wrote:
There's a simple temporary workaround. In the
routine vacm_create_simple(), look for the code
strcpy( viewname, "_all_" );
view_ptr = NULL;
and comment these two lines out. That will revert
to the previous behaviour of separate views, which
works OK.
Seems
I have a build of net-snmp refreshed from CVS on 10/20. I also have a
build of net-snmp-5.2.1.2. I have configured with the same exact
options and built in the same way. The problem is the CVS exe is
gigantic, while the 5.2.1.2 exe is very small. I was wondering what
gives? It looks like both
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:49:05 -0300 Jordan wrote:
JJLDS> > I suggest you build a version with debug enabled, for testing.
JJLDS>
JJLDS> Do I have to put a directive in Makefile or I compile with configure
JJLDS> shown by the site?
No, the default configure parameters should leave debugging enabl
I think I've tracked down the source of the problem.
One of the changes I made was to introduce a couple
of fixed views - "_all_" and "_none_", rather than
defining a separate (anonymous) view for each
unrestricted access setting. These are set up
as part of the the vacm_conf initialisation.
Unf
> On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:56:59 -0300 Jordan wrote:
> JJLDS> > snmpd -f -Lo -Dagentx
> JJLDS>
> JJLDS> This commando doesn't shows me any message of debug
> in the JJLDS> console that runs the daemon.
>
> Sounds like your libraries are compile without debug, which is going
> to mak
When I enable v3 trap, I set the following in snmpd.conf
trapsess -v 3 -e 0x0102030405 -u myuser -l authNoPriv -a MD5 -A
123456789 localhost:162
It works fine. But I wonder the password is human readable? Is there
security concern?
Thanks,
FT
---
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 18:22 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> CVS MAIN seems to currently suffer a few "make test" failures (Linux/x86):
> Dave, any chance this is related to your latest auth* token changes?
Yes - I notice you and Robert casting aspersions in my direction :-)
Unfortunately, these su
-Coders,
CVS MAIN seems to currently suffer a few "make test" failures (Linux/x86):
20:testing SNMPv3 snmptrapd USM user management with snmpusm...FAIL
21:testing SNMPv3 informs received and sent by tools...FAIL
22:testing SNMPv3 informs (authNoPriv) received and sent by tools...FAIL
23:test
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:56:59 -0300 Jordan wrote:
JJLDS> >snmpd -f -Lo -Dagentx
JJLDS>
JJLDS> This commando doesn't shows me any message of debug in the
JJLDS> console that runs the daemon.
Sounds like your libraries are compile without debug, which is going to make
it difficult t
Dave Shield wrote:
$ sudo snmpd -f -Le 10.1.2.3
NET-SNMP version 5.2.1.2
$ sudo snmpd -f -Le 127.0.0.1
[init_smux] bind failed: Address already in use
NET-SNMP version 5.2.1.2
(in separate windows, of course!)
I must admit that I haven't tried it with t
On Sat, 2005-10-22 at 10:18 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> Dave> I'd like to see if we could stretch them to
> Dave> cover 97 or 98% of cases :-)
>
> Feel free!
OK - you can relax now, Wes. I think I've finished
meddling with your new auth* tokens. I hope I haven't
mangled your intentions too ba
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 17:39 +0530, Kandasamy wrote:
> To send v1/v2 trap/inform net-snmp uses community string, trapsink
> trap2sink informsink configured in the snmpd.conf.
>
> In case of V3, we don't have any information stored in it?
Wrong.
Have a look at the 'snmpd.conf' man pag
hai,
If a SET request is pending in the agent, what other requests will be
put on hold until that SET request is processed? Is it that requests for
oids handled by handlers different from the one for that SET request will
also put on hold? What about requests for other contexts?
We are com
Hi
To send v1/v2 trap/inform net-snmp uses community string, trapsink
trap2sink informsink configured in the snmpd.conf.
In case of V3, we don't have any information stored in it? (In net-snmp
5.2.1). "snmpconf -g basic_setup" command is not asking any information
about
On Mon, 24 Oct 2005, Dave Shield wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 11:01 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 14:01:44 +0100 Dave wrote:
> > DS> > I do agree with Peder on shared IPv4/IPv6 storage as a char array (and
> > DS> > that's what I did for the data access functions for the M
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 14:45 +0530, aakansha rajvi wrote:
> On 10/25/05, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean something like
>
> snmpd 10.1.2.3
> snmpd 10.4.5.6
> snmpd 176.16.1.1
>
> Yes .. Is it possible to sta
On 10/25/05, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 12:06 +0530, aakansha rajvi wrote:> I would like to run multiple agents on different port in a single> managed device(Linux machine) wirh Virtual IP Addresses.You mean something like
snmpd 10.1.2.3snmpd 1
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 12:06 +0530, aakansha rajvi wrote:
> I would like to run multiple agents on different port in a single
> managed device(Linux machine) wirh Virtual IP Addresses.
You mean something like
snmpd 10.1.2.3
snmpd 10.4.5.6
snmpd 176.16.1.1
> Do anybo
24 matches
Mail list logo
