Yes, I used MFD code. The command is:
env MIBS="+MAU-MIB" mib2c mib2c.mfd.conf ifMauTable
The error message is:
** ACK! I cannot handle BITS longer than 4 bytes!
In file "details-enums.m2i"
I'm working on a 32-bits machine. I going to stay with
my workaround for this first pass.
Dominique
--
Robert Story wrote:
> I'd be more impressed w/tests on Solaris x86 vs Solaric Sparc.
>
> I can't see how just reversing the patch, which fixed some platform, is going
> to work w/out breaking that platform again.
Well, I think the original patch didn't fix that platform. It didn't
even change the
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 17:38:47 +0200 Thomas wrote:
TA> Thomas Anders wrote:
TA> > I've attached a patch against 5.3.x CVS that adjusts the change to how
TA> > it was probably meant in the first place. It finally brings
TA> > udpLocalAddress handling in line with udpLocalPort handling.
TA> >
TA> > I'
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 08:31:13 -0400 (EDT) Dominique wrote:
DB> I currently work on an implementation of the
DB> EtherLike-MIB and the MAU-MIB inside netSNMP. When I
DB> generate the code for the ifMauTable the mib2c stop
DB> with the error about the limitation of BITS to 32
DB> bits. the object ifMa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi --
A long time ago in a far and distant place, I sent a patch to ucd-
snmp in order to support extraction of package names and install times
from an rpmdb.
Well, that wasn't the bestest hack I've ever done. Tying a network
daemon into an instal
Thomas Anders wrote:
> I've attached a patch against 5.3.x CVS that adjusts the change to how
> it was probably meant in the first place. It finally brings
> udpLocalAddress handling in line with udpLocalPort handling.
>
> I'm calling for votes to apply this to 5.3.1.
Works for me at least for Li
Hi,
I currently work on an implementation of the
EtherLike-MIB and the MAU-MIB inside netSNMP. When I
generate the code for the ifMauTable the mib2c stop
with the error about the limitation of BITS to 32
bits. the object ifMauTypeListBits is now 41 bits long
to support 10G interfaces.
I remove
Thomas Anders wrote:
> Checking 5.3.x CVS, I still/again(?) see byte order issues in udpTable
> for a number of platforms, including Linux/x86. Examples:
>
> Linux/x86:
> UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.10.8.2.1.123 = IpAddress: 1.2.8.10
> UDP-MIB::udpLocalAddress.127.0.0.1.123 = IpAddress: 1.0.0.127
> U
Hi,
In HP-Open View unloading of MIB is not proper, I have two MIB, which has same
trap name " adpAlarmStateEnabled " (id:9001) , but Trap OID is different, ie,
in one MIB it is " 1.3.6.4.1.x.9001", and in second MIB "1.3.6.4.1.y.9001".
When X MIB is Loaded after Loading Y MIB, HP-Open View g