Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Err, the one thing that worries about this patch is that you're hard
> coding block size values in various places:
>
> TA> +mem->size = meminfo.physmem + (swaptotal*512/pagesz);
>
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Err, the one thing that worries about this patch is that you're hard
coding block size values in various places:
TA> +mem->size = meminfo.physmem + (swaptotal*512/pagesz);
^^^
a
I don't like changing behaviours in mid-stream.
I've got some other concerns with swap etc. reporting but for the moment
I'll
+1
*
-Coders,
ucd-snmp/memory in 5.4 uses the mem HAL and has (in
agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/memory.c):
case MEMORY_FR
-Coders,
this patch fixes the new mem HAL code for IRIX to report figures that actually
make sense and match those reported by the "top" utility.
As memory figures are among the ones most often monitored, reporting bad values
really sucks, IMHO, so please consider voting for inclusion in 5.4.
Th
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> ucd-snmp/memory in 5.4 uses the mem HAL and has (in
TA> agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/memory.c):
+1 assuming it works. Didn't test.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
Using
-Coders,
ucd-snmp/memory in 5.4 uses the mem HAL and has (in
agent/mibgroup/ucd-snmp/memory.c):
case MEMORY_FREE:
/* XXX - or NS_MEM_TYPE_VIRTMEM */
mem_info = netsnmp_memory_get_byIdx( NETSNMP_MEM_TYPE_PHYSMEM, 0 );
if (!m
AB> I would like to enable DLL support for the applications including
AB> snmpd and snmptrapd. We currently only support using the library DLL
AB> when building the Perl module.
Looks good to me.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
On 27/10/06, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The code generated by the mfd template does not correctly calculate the length
> of a bits field when all the bits between a byte boundary are 0, but a later
> byte does have some bits set (eg 0x8f008e). This patch fixes the code
> template.
On 27/10/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch below fixes the problem stated in patch #1578339 but in a
> different way
+1
Dave
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
G
On 27/10/06, Avnindra Singh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah. I'm aware of the implementation in the main agent. Requirements
> are to make it a part of a subagent.
So configure the main agent to not include this module,
and compile a subagent that *does* include these files.
There's no need to
On 27/10/06, Venkata Guddeti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Forgot to give my snmpd.conf file.
> rocommunity gbbf
> rwcommunity gbbf
>From the FAQ:
How do I configure access control?
-
Note that it is *not* necessary (and not advisible) to specify the
same c
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> The last week or so has been relatively stable and I'd like to release
> a rc1 on the 27th - 29th or so (patch proposals being the biggest
> thing to wait for). thoughts?
I still need to come up with a minimized set of changes to fix the pain
related to nlist errors on 64-bi
Robert Story wrote:
> The code generated by the mfd template does not correctly calculate the length
> of a bits field when all the bits between a byte boundary are 0, but a later
> byte does have some bits set (eg 0x8f008e). This patch fixes the code
> template.
>
> There is no code in any net-s
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:28:30 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH>
WH> The last week or so has been relatively stable and I'd like to release
WH> a rc1 on the 27th - 29th or so (patch proposals being the biggest
WH> thing to wait for). thoughts?
I vote for Saturday, or late today (PST).
> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RS> The code generated by the mfd template does not correctly
RS> calculate the length of a bits field when all the bits between a
RS> byte boundary are 0, but a later byte does have some bits set (eg
RS> 0x8f008e). This patch fixes the code t
The code generated by the mfd template does not correctly calculate the length
of a bits field when all the bits between a byte boundary are 0, but a later
byte does have some bits set (eg 0x8f008e). This patch fixes the code template.
There is no code in any net-snmp module that has this incorrec
Hi All I messed up my snmpd configuration some how, but I have not touched snmpd.conf though. Now my problem is that when I try to do snmpset on any of the writable variables, I get error "notWritable". I have done checks to see the how the agent is registering and the MIB file. They all seem to b
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> The patch below fixes the problem stated in patch #1578339 but in a
> different way (IE, the way we've been doing it in the past). But now
> rather than creating a zillion .so files in CVS, the makefile
> generates them and cleans them up... A bit more efficient. However,
>
On Thu, 26 Oct 2006 16:27:28 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> The patch below fixes the problem stated in patch #1578339 but in a
WH> different way (IE, the way we've been doing it in the past). But now
WH> rather than creating a zillion .so files in CVS, the makefile
WH> generates them and cleans them up...
Alex Burger wrote:
> The attached patch fixes the externs, and allows for building with the
> DLL in the MSVC command line build system.
>
> This should not affect non-Windows in any way, and will only affect
> Windows by allowing the user to build with the DLL without having to
> modify the build
I generated sub agent code for scalars in HOST-RESOURCES_MIB using:
>> env MIBS="+HOST-RESOURCES-MIB" mib2c -c mib2c.scalar.conf hrSystem
>
>
> I presume you realise that the Net-SNMP agent already implements this
> particular group? (See agent/mibgroup/host/hr_system.c)
>
Dave,
Thanks for you r
21 matches
Mail list logo
