The attached patch fixes dist/net-snmp.spec to allow for building RPMs on 64-bit
platforms by consistently using proper %{_libdir} (translating to /usr/lib64 on
x86_64) instead of hard-coding /usr/lib. Tested on RHEL4/x86 and RHEL4/x86_64.
I'm calling for quick votes to include this in 5.4.
+Tho
I've just updated dist/net-snmp.spec in CVS MAIN.
I've tested it on Fedora 5 i586 and it works for me.
Is there anyone willing to test it on other Fedora versions (FC6 preferred),
architectures (x86_64) and/or "--without embedded_perl"?
Feedback appreciated.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.a
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> I presume I'm free to go ahead and apply these changes then?
Yep.
DS> If I get the chance (and it's a bloody big if at the moment),
DS> would people be happy for me to do a similar exercise with
DS> some of the other groups?
I'd say yes
For what it's worth, he's the lowdown on how freemem is calculated for
Solaris.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gavin
Maltby
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2006 3:38 AM
To: Neale Ferguson
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [osol-
DS> If I get the chance (and it's a bloody big if at the moment),
DS> would people be happy for me to do a similar exercise with
DS> some of the other groups?
TA>Fine by me.
Me, too.
This communication is intended for the use of the recipient to which it is
addressed, and may contain confidentia
Dave Shield wrote:
> I presume I'm free to go ahead and apply these changes then?
>
> If I get the chance (and it's a bloody big if at the moment),
> would people be happy for me to do a similar exercise with
> some of the other groups?
Fine by me.
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders at b
On 22/11/06, Shanmugha Mari <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am using ifIndex as index for my one of the table, if the OID is say big
> number (EX - 1.3.6.1.4.1.24625.2.1.4.2.1.1.268967936) .
That should be fine.
Each numeric subidentifier can be anything up to 2^32-1 (=4294967295)
You're comfort
HI,
I am using ifIndex as index for my one of the table, if the OID is say big
number (EX - 1.3.6.1.4.1.24625.2.1.4.2.1.1.268967936) .
The function snmp_parse_oid(const char *argv, oid * root, size_t * rootlen)
is returning error, but for other OID it's working fine. So how to parse the
Exa
On 22/11/06, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The changes (with comments taken care of) look good. I have only one
> other suggestion and that's to rename "ErrorFlag" to "UCDErrorFlag" to
> avoid the likely conflict with something else at some point.
Yup - that's sensible (and easy to d
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Of course. I'd forgotten about that clause.
Dave,
The changes (with comments taken care of) look good. I have only one
other suggestion and that's to rename "ErrorFlag" to "UCDErrorFlag" to
avoid the likely conflict with something else
hi,
+1 for the patch
darix
--
openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
openSUSE is good for you
www.opensuse.org
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge
Dave Shield wrote:
> Updated patch attached
A few initial minor remarks. Don't have time for a full review atm.
> ucdavis MODULE-IDENTITY
> -LAST-UPDATED "20061107Z"
> +LAST-UPDATED "20061122Z"
> ORGANIZATION "University of California, Davis"
> CONTACT-INFO
>
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> 1) create a makefile rule for creating each alias file. I think this
>is not as easily maintainable, but is probably the more proper
>"make" solution in a strict sense.
>
> 2) create a temp file that acts as a "have done it" flag. This is
>what the patch below d
> snmptrapd in net-snmp 5.3 and later was meant to ship with a new "-A" option
> to
> append to the logfile rather than truncating it.
> However, as correctly noted in bug #1587759, we've actually missed to add "-A"
> to the list of legal options! Patch #1598968, submitted by Peter Eckel and
> at
> Unfortunately there has been a small, but significant mistake in my patch that
> neither my testing nor the reviews revealed.
> The attached trivial patch (a slightly modified variant of his proposed patch
> #1598966) fixes this. I'm calling for votes to apply this before 5.4 final.
+1
This w
On 22/11/06, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I suggest to use UNITS clauses to document units. Some applications can
then show the appropriate unit automatically.
Of course. I'd forgotten about that clause.
Updated patch attached
Dave
Index: UCD-SNMP-MIB.txt
==
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 11:21:43AM +, Dave Shield wrote:
> Please find attached the proposed changes to UCD-SNMP-MIB.txt.
> This basically clarifies the descriptions of the memory and systemStats
> groups - defining the actual behaviour in much greater detail, rather than
> leaving things impl
Please find attached the proposed changes to UCD-SNMP-MIB.txt.
This basically clarifies the descriptions of the memory and systemStats
groups - defining the actual behaviour in much greater detail, rather than
leaving things implicit or vague.
I'd like to see this included in 5.4, if at all possi
thanks Sir,
As you said i set like this in my conf
trapsess -v 3 . localhost:162
snmp trap are received by snmptrapd so port number might be
the problem.
thanks you very much Sir
Regards
bhushan. E . Sonawane
On 11/22/06, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 22/11/06, bhushan <[EMAIL P
On 22/11/06, bhushan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) trapsess -v 3 -e 0x010203040506 -a MD5 -A auth_password -l authPriv -u
> my_user -x AES128 -X priv_password localhost
> 2 )trap2sink localhost public 162
> dump of snmptrapd as follows when i send trap using my code
>
> Received 107 bytes
20 matches
Mail list logo