> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RS> I seriously doubt that they actually evaluate all the code using the library
RS> to actually determine that.
RS> They could actaully get away with not caring about structure size if
RS> they _always_ obtained and released the structures
> "RS" == Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RS> Which is why I still think 5.4.1 should bump current and
RS> not just age.
You do realize we did right?
svn diff -r 15624 Makefile.top
Index: Makefile.top
===
--- Makefile.t
Need Help wrote:
> Ok I am using the "-x none" as the --with-ldflags option and I have applied
> the patches to the Makefile.in files as you have recommended. The "error
> stray" errors are now gone, but I am now receiving the following linker
> errors:
[...]
> ./.libs/libnetsnmpmibs.a(at.o):
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi!
> I've read several messages about building Net-SNMP Windows version, but I'
> have this problem:
.
.
> I've,also, make run "register PSDK directories with Visual Studio" but, I've
> noticed that it had not included directories, so , I've done it by myself
> includ
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 14:04:53 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> TA> Great they do understand -- because I'm not sure I do (based on your
WH> TA> description above). What's their "special case" and what exactly do they
WH> TA> expect us to do?
WH>
WH> There special case was also described: they're not going to u
Ok I am using the "-x none" as the --with-ldflags option and I have applied the
patches to the Makefile.in files as you have recommended. The "error stray"
errors are now gone, but I am now receiving the following linker errors:
/bin/sh ../libtool --mode=compile mipsel-uclibc-g++ -I../include
[Sorry for the delays in responding. Things have been
a little hectic recently - both at work and domestically]
On 28/06/07, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 15:11:26 +0100 Dave wrote:
> DS> I'm just thinking that if we're looking to separate out the data_access
> c
I changed the compiler in the "./configure" options to use the "gcc" compiler
and I get the same errors showing up in the "config.log" file. Below is just
a bit of the kinds of errors I am encountering:
configure:7263: gcc -o conftest -x c conftest.c conftstm.o >&5
conftstm.o:1: error: stray
On 29/06/07, Need Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have not received any recommendation from you which indicates how to fix
> these "error stray" errors.
Magnus is quite correct. He *did* point out where you are going wrong:
> The problem is that the effect of the -x c flag is to tell the comp
Again I am sorry . I have not seen any reply to my "Configure "-x c"
options with "--with-cflags" does not work for me." post. I just looked for
it in the NetSNMP email archives and found it. I will have the build people
look it over. Thanks for the info and sorry again about not seeing
I believe you recomended a solution regarding my previous compiler problem of
the "C99 way of doing struct initialization" seen in v5.4 of the
"snmpUDPDomain.c" file. You recommended I get the v5.4.1 prerelease to find
the fix, which I did and the file now compiles. However, after applying th
Hi!
I've read several messages about building Net-SNMP Windows version, but I' have
this problem:
..\..\snmplib\snmpTCPDomain.c(187) : error C2065: 'socklen_t' : undeclared
identifier
..\..\snmplib\snmpTCPDomain.c(187) : error C2146: syntax error : missing ';'
before identifier 'farendlen'
..\
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:30:27 -0400
Alex Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mitsuru Chinen wrote:
> > On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 22:06:03 +0900
> > Mitsuru Chinen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Then, how about the attached patch?
> >>
> The patch fixes the long long issue, but doesn't ad
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:17:59AM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> On 28/06/07, Need Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 3) We also noticed this interesting bit as well. We started from scratch
> > by uncompressing Net-SNMP-v5.4 and then performed a "./configure" (with the
> > options shown in the po
On 28/06/07, Need Help <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3) We also noticed this interesting bit as well. We started from scratch
> by uncompressing Net-SNMP-v5.4 and then performed a "./configure" (with the
> options shown in the post below). We then looked into the "config.log" file
> and noticed t
15 matches
Mail list logo
