On 20/09/2007, Anuradha A- TLS, Chennai. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I generated the .c and .h files using "mib2c.create-dataset.conf" for a
> table with a integer as index. (only one index for the table)
>
> The GETNEXT on the table works correctly , but the GET fails for some
> reason. (always
On 20/09/2007, Anuradha A- TLS, Chennai. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is the Co-existence mib being implemented in net-snmp?
What do you mean by the Co-existence MIB?
Can you provide a reference?
If you mean the SNMP-COMMUNITY-MIB (defined in RFC3584, the
co-existence specification), then no - t
I use both 64-bit AMD and 32-bit Intel CPU's with the same source under
Linux, using long for 32-bit types and long long for 64-bit types in C++
with gcc. Had no problems yet.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
mushtaq khan
Sent: 21 September
Title: Request help in Table implementation
Hi
I generated the .c and .h files using "mib2c.create-dataset.conf" for a table with a integer as index. (only one index for the table)
I did follow the steps as in the example "data_set.c".
The GETNEXT on the table works correctly , but the
Hi All
I have few basic questions on snmpv3 implementation in net-snmp.
Please bear with me for the trivial questions.
Is the Co-existence mib being implemented in net-snmp?
If No, how is the co-existence of v1,v2c and v3 being achieved?
How and where the community strings for v1 and v2c are be
On 20-Sep-2007, at 5:08 AM, shwth_k kk wrote:
It would be great if anybody could help us, we need to handle the
INFORM RESPONSE received from the SNMP Manager in the subAgent module
Since these pleas for free work pop up periodically, it's worth
pointing out to the broader group that there a
