On ons, 2007-09-26 at 17:09 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> > "CA" == Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> CA> Just curious if anyone has started to look at or think about making
> CA> snmptrap and snmptrapd IPv6 aware? If not I'll be starting looking
> CA> at it shortly, just didn't want
> "CA" == Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CA> Just curious if anyone has started to look at or think about making
CA> snmptrap and snmptrapd IPv6 aware? If not I'll be starting looking
CA> at it shortly, just didn't want to duplicate effort.
I believe it should already?
Ok, I was all
kc> snmpset -c public 127.0.0.1 mVgSipDnsServerRowStatus.1.\"10.1.5.100\" i
kc> 4
That command creates a row using the string "10.1.5.100" which is not
how ip addresses are supposed to be embedded into a OID according to the
textual convention you are using. The proper set would be:
snmpset -c
> "VC" == Varun Chandramohan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
VC> Hi,
VC> I was testing net-snmp-5.3.1 tar ball and i found that tcp and
VC> udp scalars dont seem to work.
VC> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost mib-2.6.1
VC> TCP-MIB::tcpRtoAlgorithm = No Such Instance currently
> "AK" == Amit Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AK> from google groups i found this but now i have to
AK> implement the Bridge Mib . and i don't have any idea
AK> to implementing .
You should start by looking at the tutorials that talk about how to
write agent code:
http://www.net-snmp.org
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> I'm hereby calling for votes to post the attached patch as an official
TA> patch for 5.4.1.
+1 just to be complete.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
This SF.net emai
