TA == Thomas Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
TA I'm hereby calling for votes to post the attached patch as an official
TA patch for 5.4.1.
+1 just to be complete.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
This SF.net email is
AK == Amit Kumar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AK from google groups i found this but now i have to
AK implement the Bridge Mib . and i don't have any idea
AK to implementing .
You should start by looking at the tutorials that talk about how to
write agent code:
VC == Varun Chandramohan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
VC Hi,
VC I was testing net-snmp-5.3.1 tar ball and i found that tcp and
VC udp scalars dont seem to work.
VC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ snmpwalk -v 2c -c public localhost mib-2.6.1
VC TCP-MIB::tcpRtoAlgorithm = No Such Instance currently exists at
VC
kc snmpset -c public 127.0.0.1 mVgSipDnsServerRowStatus.1.\10.1.5.100\ i
kc 4
That command creates a row using the string 10.1.5.100 which is not
how ip addresses are supposed to be embedded into a OID according to the
textual convention you are using. The proper set would be:
snmpset -c
CA == Chris Abbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CA Just curious if anyone has started to look at or think about making
CA snmptrap and snmptrapd IPv6 aware? If not I'll be starting looking
CA at it shortly, just didn't want to duplicate effort.
I believe it should already?
Ok, I was all set to say
On ons, 2007-09-26 at 17:09 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
CA == Chris Abbey [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
CA Just curious if anyone has started to look at or think about making
CA snmptrap and snmptrapd IPv6 aware? If not I'll be starting looking
CA at it shortly, just didn't want to duplicate
