HI Dave..
Im sorry for mailing you directly.
There was no intention in getting any private consultation..
I just hit Reply instead of Reply to All by mistake.
I would not repeate the same.
Thanks
Anand
On 4/7/08, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ First - *please* don't mail me priva
On 28/03/2008, Sun Le <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a thoughtCould I code the agent,using the specified port for
> snmpd like 5077 etc,and communicating with the device on default snmp
> 161 port?Is that possible?
It's not particularly clear what you're trying to do here.
The agent wo
Thanks you so much guys...
I will be in the office tmrw..and try all these combinations and report back
in detail...
Thanks again
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 10:13 PM, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 07/04/2008, anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I tried applying this patch but the pa
On 07/04/2008, anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried applying this patch but the patch was failing at the time i applied
> to throwing some error regarding a macro which was undeclared or something.
I'd suggest grabbing a current SVN snapshot from
http://www.net-snmp.org/nightly/tarballs/
Dave,
> Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 03/04/2008, Mike Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I've got a question on how failures are supposed to work with snmpv3
> > > when I'm using authPriv and I supply a bad privPassword. Is the request
> > > just supposed to timeout
Dave,
Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03/04/2008, Mike Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got a question on how failures are supposed to work with snmpv3
> > when I'm using authPriv and I supply a bad privPassword. Is the request
> > just supposed to timeout (like I'm se
On 10/03/2008, Aleksandr Lomanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> in function parse_capabilities() in file parse.c,
> line 3212:
> I think it is better the variable "token" to change to
> charquoted_string_buffer[MAXQUOTESTR];
Yes - that's definitely better.
It brings the capabilit
On 18/03/2008, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Net-snmp 5.0.8 is working fine on Blackfin uClinux.
> In linux, all the MIB files are stored under /usr/local/share/snmp/mibs
> folder. The snmpd demon gets the mib files from there.
>
> Similarly, Where exactly we have to put the mib files in uCli
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On 27/03
[ First - *please* don't mail me privately, without copying
any responses to the mailing list. I don't have the time
or inclination to offer private, unpaid, SNMP consultancy.
Keep discussions to the list, where others can both learn
and offer advice. Thanks. ]
On 07/0
On 03/04/2008, Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So after i upgraded i started facing the issue on SIGHUP:
> 2006-04-28 17:22:21 error on subcontainer '' insert (-1)
> 2006-04-28 17:22:21 error on subcontainer '' insert (-1)
> 2006-04-28 17:22:21 error on subcontainer '' insert (-1)
> Searchi
On 03/04/2008, Mike Harless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've got a question on how failures are supposed to work with snmpv3
> when I'm using authPriv and I supply a bad privPassword. Is the request
> just supposed to timeout (like I'm seeing), or should I get some type
> of error back (like
12 matches
Mail list logo
