Re: 5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-15 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On tis, 2008-04-15 at 14:59 -0700, Larry Dickson wrote: > Hi all, > > Our path from net-snmp 5.2.1 to 5.4.1 has been blocked for months > because the latter refuses to talk to our subagent. It worked fine in > 5.2.1; we could even do a full walk through our MIB. Has anyone run > across a problem

working with tables...

2008-04-15 Thread Alejandro Islas
Hi all, I'm trying to develop a private mib module that involves both scalars and a couple of tables. I don't have any problems with the scalars, I can read them using snmpwalk without problems. But when I try to read a table..the snmpd deamon crashes. I use mib2c to generate my code's template, an

Re: Thread-safe patch for Perl SNMP XS glue

2008-04-15 Thread Thomas Anders
Chris Coyle wrote: > Example code is attached (test_for_snmplist). The behavior I would see > previous to the patch was that all threads but one would hang waiting > for a response PDU, presumably because the Traditional API synch call > collects all the return information from any active SNMP ses

Thread-safe patch for Perl SNMP XS glue

2008-04-15 Thread Chris Coyle
Greetings All, This started when I needed to (with relative swiftness) whip up a threaded snmp poller using getbulk operations to pull interface stats off a large number of devices. And while I'm toying with the idea of porting it to C, I suspect there may be some desire in the community for thre

5.4.1 won't talk

2008-04-15 Thread Larry Dickson
Hi all, Our path from net-snmp 5.2.1 to 5.4.1 has been blocked for months because the latter refuses to talk to our subagent. It worked fine in 5.2.1; we could even do a full walk through our MIB. Has anyone run across a problem like this? Following are some collected notes. TIA, Larry The new /

RE: Where is the patch for [ net-snmp-Bugs-1758212 ]notification-log agent does not support all variable types

2008-04-15 Thread Emi Yanagi
Hi Maqnus, Thanks for your quick response. The patch seems didn't fix the following problem: Snmpwalk could NOT populate nlmLogVariableTimeTicksVal and nlmLogVariableOidVal, although using snmpget I can get these two objects. # snmpwalk localhost nlmLog NOTIFICATION-LOG-MIB::nlmLogTime."".1 = T

Re: Where is the patch for [ net-snmp-Bugs-1758212 ] notification-log agent does not support all variable types

2008-04-15 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On tis, 2008-04-15 at 12:11 -0700, Emi Yanagi wrote: > Hi Dave, > > I am glad to know this bug was fixed, but I couldn’t find the patch. > Could you please point me where I can download the patch for 5.3.1. I > am using Net-SNMP 5.3.1. Revision 16759 The best fit for a single patch would be htt

Where is the patch for [ net-snmp-Bugs-1758212 ] notification-log agent does not support all variable types

2008-04-15 Thread Emi Yanagi
Hi Dave, I am glad to know this bug was fixed, but I couldn't find the patch. Could you please point me where I can download the patch for 5.3.1. I am using Net-SNMP 5.3.1. Thanks for your support. Best regards, Emi

Re: [RFC PATCH] Ensure oid sub-ids are always 32bit

2008-04-15 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:41:01 +0100, Alex Bennee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: AB> Besides if external code is using u_long as it's base type I'm tempted AB> to say they deserve what they get. Actually, I'm sure much of it was copied from bad code in the project. So I'm not sure they do. AB> oi

Re: [RFC PATCH] Ensure oid sub-ids are always 32bit

2008-04-15 Thread Alex Bennee
On Tue, 2008-04-15 at 08:15 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:57:35 +0100, "Alex Bennee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > said: > > AB> + typedef uint32_t oid; > > vs > > AB> + typedef u_long oid; > > > There are a number of places that could benefit from a switch to a tr

Re: Issue with localized keys support for SNMPUSM(5.1.4)

2008-04-15 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:58:53 +0530, anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: a> Kindly let me know if there is any patch or an add on available that a> supplies support for localized Key changes in 5.1.4.(-Ck Option). You might be able to copy a recent apps/snmpusm.c file to the older 5.1.4 line of

Re: [RFC PATCH] Ensure oid sub-ids are always 32bit

2008-04-15 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 13:57:35 +0100, "Alex Bennee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > said: AB> + typedef uint32_t oid; vs AB> + typedef u_long oid; There are a number of places that could benefit from a switch to a true int32. OIDs are only one such place (standard Integer or Integer32 dat

Re: SNMP V3 walk failed in Net-SNMP

2008-04-15 Thread Dave Shield
On 15/04/2008, Lakshmipriya Subramanian (CW) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The following configuration details were added up in the > snmpd.conf file Please re-read the file README.snmpv3 *carefully*. There are *TWO* config files mentioned there, and they are not the same. > I in

RE: SNMP V3 walk failed in Net-SNMP

2008-04-15 Thread Lakshmipriya Subramanian (CW)
Dave The following configuration details were added up in the snmpd.conf file mibdirs C:/usr/share/snmp/mibs persistentDir C:/usr/snmp/persist tempFilePattern C:/usr/temp/snmpdXX defSecurityName TestAuthpriv defContext "" defAuthType MD5 defSecurityLevel authPriv defAuthPassphrase 123

Re: SNMP V3 walk failed in Net-SNMP

2008-04-15 Thread Dave Shield
On 15/04/2008, Lakshmipriya Subramanian (CW) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > SNMPWALK and SNMPGET for v3 MIB objects implemented in our firmware is > failing. The error is coming from NET-SNMP tool. I am thinking it could be a > configuration problem with NET-SNMP. Can you let me know how to configure

SNMP V3 walk failed in Net-SNMP

2008-04-15 Thread Lakshmipriya Subramanian (CW)
Hi SNMPWALK and SNMPGET for v3 MIB objects implemented in our firmware is failing. The error is coming from NET-SNMP tool. I am thinking it could be a configuration problem with NET-SNMP. Can you let me know how to configure the snmpd.conf file for V3 users namely 'username with auth protocol,

Re: [RFC PATCH] Ensure oid sub-ids are always 32bit

2008-04-15 Thread Alex Bennee
On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 23:14 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On mån, 2008-04-14 at 13:57 +0100, Alex Bennee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > As noted in earlier messages the sizeof(oid) on a 64 bit machine is 8 > > bytes due to the use of u_long. This patch ensures that an oid is always > > 32 bit by using