Thanks for your reply dave,
Your comment helped to configure ether like mib, and I have done make
and make install.
Everything goes fine. But when I am trying to use snmpwalk Its not
displaying the objects related to etherlike mib the command
which i have used is like
snmpwalk -v
> From: Pachiappan D [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 8:58 AM
> I am extending the net-snmp agent (5.4.1).
>
>
> RFC 3414 allows the following security postures ,
> 1. minimum-secure
>
> 2.semi-secure
> 3.very-secure
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 12:31:22 -0400, Geoffrey Bays
> said:
GB> I am compiling a C++ wrapper of some net_snmp libs on a Red Hat machine.
GB> By adding -lwrap, -lrpm, and -lsensors I have reduced the errors to
GB> the following four:
Those are from snmptrapd_handlers.c
--
Wes Hardaker
SP
> On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:38:31 +0530 (IST), B V Narasimhulu
> said:
Sorry for the delay. I'm frequently the person that responds to SNMPv3
related questions, but I've been gone almost continuously for the past 3
weeks.
BVN> I have configured SNMPv3 user on the snmpd.conf file as with
B
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:38:16 +0530, Pachiappan D
> said:
PD> RFC 3414 allows the following security postures ,
PD> 1. minimum-secure
PD> 2.semi-secure
PD> 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration)
Be default we have no configuration of either snmpv3 users or snmpv1/v2c
community n
Can anyone please advice me on this ?
-Pachi-
On 4/8/09, Pachiappan D wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I am extending the net-snmp agent (5.4.1).
>
> RFC 3414 allows the following security postures ,
> 1. minimum-secure
> 2.semi-secure
> 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration)
>
> May i know the security
I have been waiting for the reply ...
--- On Mon, 30/3/09, B V Narasimhulu wrote:
> From: B V Narasimhulu
> Subject: Q: SNMPv3 traps
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Monday, 30 March, 2009, 6:38 PM
> Hi,
>
> I have configured SNMPv3 user on the snmpd.conf file
