On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 09:54:47 -0500 Jeff wrote:
JJ> On Mar 4, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Jan Safranek wrote:
JJ> > in all supported branches there should be check in ./configure script,
JJ> > which enables legacy RPM API when the user has newer RPM (4.6 and later).
JJ> >
JJ> > Today I wanted to port the ne
Can someone remind me what the consensus is on the short form for unsigned
types? There seems to be a bunch of type changing going on (which is bad),
apparently to help windows builds (which is good, I suppose). But it doesn't
even seem consistent there:
@@ -573,7 +573,7 @@ netsnmp_compare_long(c
On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:14:27 +0100 Magnus wrote:
MF> On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 12:35 +, [email protected] wrote:
MF> > Revision: 18166
MF> > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18166&view=rev
MF> > ---
MF> > Backported r17869: changed the return type of
Robert Story wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:00:22 +0100 Josef wrote:
> JM> > whoops... I meant attach it to the bug report!
> JM>
> JM> There is no bug report, as far as I know.
>
> Ah... then submitting the patch to the patch tracker is the best thing to do..
> http://net-snmp.org/patches/ shou
On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:27:46 +0100 Cancani wrote:
CD> The table elements and values must be stored in the file system because I
CD> do not have much RAM to use.
Do you have enough memory to at least keep the indexes in memory, either
temporarily or all the time? If so, you can use the MfD, containe
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:09:00 +0100 Magnus wrote:
MF> > - also added several compare routines
MF>
MF> But on this one I have to ask myself why? Could you please elaborate on
MF> the purpose of the compare routines?
These compare routines can be specified as the compare function for a
container w
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:00:22 +0100 Josef wrote:
JM> > whoops... I meant attach it to the bug report!
JM>
JM> There is no bug report, as far as I know.
Ah... then submitting the patch to the patch tracker is the best thing to do..
http://net-snmp.org/patches/ should redirect you to the right place
I think you want to use sh instead of exec. Quoting from the man page:
"The PROG argument for exec directives must be a full path to a real
binary, as it is executed via the exec() system call. To invoke a
shell script, use the sh directive instead."
Also, I'd double check to make sure the sc
On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 04:17 +, [email protected] wrote:
> Revision: 18237
> http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=18237&view=rev
> Author: rstory
> Date: 2010-03-10 04:17:46 + (Wed, 10 Mar 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> CHANGES: snmplib: fix p
Robert Story wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:48:54 +0100 Josef wrote:
> JM> > no, you should be able to just attach the new file... you might need to
> reopen
> JM> > the patch, as Dave probably closed it when he applied the last patch...
> JM>
> JM> OK, so here goes.
> JM>
> JM> The patch is at
10 matches
Mail list logo
