Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[18166] branches/V5-5-patches/include/net-snmp/library /system.h

2010-03-13 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:51 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 09:14 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Wes Hardaker > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:44:31 +0100, Bart Van Assche > > said: > > > > BVA> It would

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[18166] branches/V5-5-patches/include/net-snmp/library /system.h

2010-03-13 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 09:14 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Wes Hardaker > wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:44:31 +0100, Bart Van Assche > said: > > BVA> It would make several Net-SNMP maintainers happy if > support fo

Re: rfc: changing snmpwalk default starting point

2010-03-13 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 17:33 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote: > > On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:00:00 +0100, Magnus Fromreide > > said: > > >> a) start at .1 > >> pros: will show all available objects > >> cons: will show all available objects > > MF> I think I prefer a slight variation on this one i

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[18166] branches/V5-5-patches/include/net-snmp/library /system.h

2010-03-13 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Wes Hardaker < [email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Feb 2010 19:44:31 +0100, Bart Van Assche < > [email protected]> said: > > BVA> It would make several Net-SNMP maintainers happy if support for > BVA> MSVC 6 could be dropped. > > It'd make ot