test for EVP_sha224/EVP_sha384 functions in openssl/evp.h instead of
hardcoding lack of them per os, since any os could have an old openssl lib
without support for these functions.
commit 988cf6c985685849ffc6071b4777ee9e74094b04
Author: Robert Story
Date: Wed Aug 25 00:02:50 2010 -0400
tes
Robert Story wrote:
> anyhoo, this patch initializes the temporary variable.
+1
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:01:24 +0200, Thomas Anders
> said:
TA> Wes Hardaker wrote:
>> To fix an error string which was a cut-n-paste without a replacement in
>> the new DTLS code.
TA> +1 (what a waste to even do voting on such a trivial
TA> change. sometimes policies feel strange.)
Y
Wes Hardaker wrote:
> To fix an error string which was a cut-n-paste without a replacement in
> the new DTLS code.
+1 (what a waste to even do voting on such a trivial change. sometimes policies
feel strange.)
--
Sell a
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 12:50 -0700, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> To fix an error string which was a cut-n-paste without a replacement in
> the new DTLS code.
+1
/MF
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Develo
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 14:46 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> Patch 3042765 breaks synchronous handling of a remote client disconnect
> for a tcp session, causing the client to be stuck inside a select() call
> waiting for data that will never come.
>
> Basically the change in session handling results i
To fix an error string which was a cut-n-paste without a replacement in
the new DTLS code.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
diff --git a/net-snmp/snmplib/transports/snmpDTLSUDPDomain.c b/net-snmp/snmplib/transports/snmpDTLSUDPDomain.c
index b4e9230
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:46:47 -0400, Robert Story
> said:
RS> The original patch is attached, and I think it should be reversed
RS> ASAP.
+1
(I applied it wondering how long it would be before spotting a problem
with it; glad it was quick... There are so so many invocation paths
that
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:00:44 -0400, Robert Story
> said:
RS> anyhoo, this patch initializes the temporary variable. The code is
RS> in the new support for (D)TLS, so it's not compiled in by default.
+1
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
Patch 3042765 breaks synchronous handling of a remote client disconnect
for a tcp session, causing the client to be stuck inside a select() call
waiting for data that will never come.
CHANGES: snmplib: PATCH 3042765: from mehaf: make snmp_synch_response_cb()
re-entrant
Here are debug traces for
r19179 fixed some compiler warnings by introducing temporary local variables
matching types in function prototypes. The temporary variable was not
initialized before being passed to the function, so it was working last week,
but is failing this week (likely due to a change in the endianess of the t
Robert Story wrote:
> Sounds reasonable. I'll cache the patch and see what happens with rc2.
To be honest, I think caching has more cons than pros here. rc2 is going to
happen anyway and the later you commit your patch, the later we identify
potential problems. IOW, my vote is to apply your patc
> On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:46:15 +0100, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> Alternatively, it might be sensible for such intermediate level changes
DS> to require a +1 vote. So in practice it should be sufficient to flag the
DS> change on the mailing list, with no dissenting voices.
I'd be good wit
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 08:46:15 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> I'm inclined to treat these in a similar to inline-documentation tweaks,
DS> i.e. only suitable if there's another RC candidate planned, but not
DS> requiring an explicit vote.
Sounds reasonable. I'll cache the patch and see what happens with rc2.
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:02:54 -0700 Abhimanyu wrote:
AC> I am useing net-snmp-5.3.3 on MIPS architecture.
You might try a more recent relese.
AC> I am getting following error messages in snmpd.log during initial snmpd
AC> bootup:
AC> netsnmp_assert !"registration != duplicate" failed agent_registr
On 23 August 2010 21:34, Robert Story wrote:
> do you think a CFV is needed for changes to non-default test scripts? i.e.
> scripts that won't be run unless explicitly requested by the user?
Probably not, no.
Changes to test scripts (and to mib2c templates) feel to lie
somewhere in between code
16 matches
Mail list logo
