Re: Help on net-snmp subagent -Crash

2010-10-17 Thread Sathish Chandrasekaran
Wes Hardaker,       Iam running netsnmp subagent on ARM board with third party master agent using unix domain socket , agentx protocol.SIGSEVG seems to happen in the free part of the netsnmp subagent.When running with gdb , I don't even get any back trace to see where is the actual problem.    

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19477] trunk/net-snmp

2010-10-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 13:49 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Magnus Fromreide > wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 13:37 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Fromreide > > wrote: > >

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19477] trunk/net-snmp

2010-10-17 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 13:37 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Fromreide > > wrote: > > On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 09:36 +, > > [email protected] wrote: > > > Rev

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19477] trunk/net-snmp

2010-10-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 13:37 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Fromreide > wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 09:36 +, > [email protected] wrote: > > Revision: 19477 > > > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19477] trunk/net-snmp

2010-10-17 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 09:36 +, [email protected] wrote: > > Revision: 19477 > > > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=19477&view=rev > > Author: bvassche > > Date: 2010-10-17 09:36:11 + (Sun, 17 Oc

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19477] trunk/net-snmp

2010-10-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 09:36 +, [email protected] wrote: > Revision: 19477 > http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=19477&view=rev > Author: bvassche > Date: 2010-10-17 09:36:11 + (Sun, 17 Oct 2010) > > Log Message: > --- > Fixed a few compile

Re: uintptr_t and win64

2010-10-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 11:34 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Magnus Fromreide > wrote: > > [ ... ] > > > At the very least it is MSVC that should be treated specially > and not > GCC, why do you have an >

Re: uintptr_t and win64

2010-10-17 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > [ ... ] > > At the very least it is MSVC that should be treated specially and not > GCC, why do you have an > > #if defined(__GNUC__) > > to handle windows oddities? > That was implemented that way because you changed uintptr_t into unsi

Re: uintptr_t and win64

2010-10-17 Thread Magnus Fromreide
On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 09:32 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Magnus Fromreide > wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 23:52 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > I found this in r19458 > > > > #if defined(__GNUC__) > > typedef unsigned

Re: uintptr_t and win64

2010-10-17 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 23:52 +0200, Magnus Fromreide wrote: > > I found this in r19458 > > > > #if defined(__GNUC__) > > typedef unsigned long netsnmp_uintptr_t; > > #else > > typedef uintptr_t netsnmp_uintptr_t; > > #endif > > #ifndef __cp