Re: upgraded trunk autoconf and libtool

2010-10-22 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Wes Hardaker < harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:52:43 +0200, Bart Van Assche < > bvanass...@acm.org> said: > > BVA> I have also added the libtool patch to that wiki page that is > BVA> necessary for configuring Net-SNMP on Cygwi

Do you need help about open bugs?

2010-10-22 Thread Claus Klein
Hi, I have submitted some problem reports, there is no response. Ok, it seems you have a lot of work, there are 192 unassigned open bugs about the agent. But I tried all to help you: I solved most of my open bugs and attached a patch and/or a test script. Now, I do not understand, why nobody

Problem with TimeTicks object

2010-10-22 Thread Andrea Agosti
Hello everybody, I have a problem with a TimeTicks object. I define a read-write TimeTicks obj in my MIB and then I put the code for handle it in my subagent. But the problem is, when I read the new value I have to set in this obj, it is different from what I set with snmpset: no matter what value

Re: Negative "request id" as perceived by wireshark and/or agents

2010-10-22 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 10:34:20 -0400, Doug Manley > said: DS> Which is why this particular option was introduced in 2003 :-) DM> You are my favorite person in the whole world right now. Thank you DM> very much. Even more so, *he* wrote the option and deserves twice the pats on the bac

Re: upgraded trunk autoconf and libtool

2010-10-22 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Thu, 21 Oct 2010 16:22:03 +0100, Dave Shield > said: DS> Question: How does the other wiki handle long cells? I forget, to be honest. And since it's a moot point... -- Wes Hardaker Please mail all replies to net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: upgraded trunk autoconf and libtool

2010-10-22 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 18:52:43 +0200, Bart Van Assche > said: BVA> I have also added the libtool patch to that wiki page that is BVA> necessary for configuring Net-SNMP on Cygwin. To my surprise it was BVA> not possible to add this patch as an attachment to the wiki page -- BVA> has this

Re: upgraded trunk autoconf and libtool

2010-10-22 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:25 PM, Thomas Anders wrote: > Wes Hardaker wrote: > > I'm committing changes to both the autoconf version and the libtool > > version (which was required for autoconf 2.68). > > Please update > http://www.net-snmp.org/wiki/index.php/Build_System#Tool_Versions when > you'r

Re: Negative "request id" as perceived by wireshark and/or agents

2010-10-22 Thread Doug Manley
You are my favorite person in the whole world right now. Thank you very much. On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 10:27 AM, Dave Shield wrote: > On 22 October 2010 14:45, Doug Manley wrote: >> To address this, we see two possible solutions: >> 1. Force every agent on the planet to support proper RequestIDs

Re: Negative "request id" as perceived by wireshark and/or agents

2010-10-22 Thread Dave Shield
On 22 October 2010 14:45, Doug Manley wrote: > To address this, we see two possible solutions: > 1. Force every agent on the planet to support proper RequestIDs. > 2. Add an option to net-snmp to wrap request IDs on the 31-bit boundary. > > I don't think that option #1 is viable, and my company ne

Negative "request id" as perceived by wireshark and/or agents

2010-10-22 Thread Doug Manley
Hello, all. I sent an e-mail a little while ago asking if anyone had a problem where net-snmp would *send* requests, but it would not get them back. Well, it turns out that I now have a reason why. The only major difference between a "bad" request and a "normal" request is the following: * A "nor