Fwd: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19544] trunk/net-snmp

2010-10-25 Thread Bart Van Assche
Hello Niels, Are you aware that r19544 modifies the Net-SNMP ABI ? Bart. -- Forwarded message -- From: n...@users.sourceforge.net Date: Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:16 AM Subject: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19544] trunk/net-snmp To: net-snmp-...@lists.sourceforge.net Revision: 19544

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19542] trunk/net-snmp/snmplib/transports

2010-10-25 Thread Bart Van Assche
Hello Niels, Neither the description of r19542 nor the changes itself make sense to me. Sorry that I have already reverted these changes via r19546 without prior notice - if I had noticed earlier that the compiler warnings I encountered were introduced by a recent change, I would have asked

Re: Multi-Thread Support

2010-10-25 Thread Doug Manley
BT 3. How should I use the authentication and privacy protocol OIDs? WH The SNMPv3 support in Net-SNMP isn't, unfortunately, thread-safe.  We WH think/hope that the replacement DTLS/TLS support coming out in a future WH release will make it thread-safe when used over DTLS though. Is there an

Re: CFV: fix includeAllDisks directive in trunk

2010-10-25 Thread Dave Shield
On 8 September 2010 16:57, Dave Shield d.t.shi...@liverpool.ac.uk wrote: As I recall:   - the initial code just looked for the config token include and      ignored everything else.   Hence it used an exact 'strcmp' comparison.  -  my re-working looked for  includeDir, includeFile and

Re: Do you need help about open bugs?

2010-10-25 Thread Wes Hardaker
On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:05:30 +0200, Claus Klein claus.kl...@arcormail.de said: CK Ok, it seems you have a lot of work, there are 192 unassigned open CK bugs about the agent. Yes, unfortunately bugs are difficult. Mainly for two reasons: 1) the bug database system leaves a lot to be

Re: getnext (snmpwalk) does not deliver the hole table (snmpd5.4.3)

2010-10-25 Thread Claus Klein
I was able to fix it. It was more than one BUG involved! First of all, the sparse table handling for the notificationLogMib does not work! Second the v1 trap pdu is different from the v2/v3 trap pdu. Than there are a lot of small BUGs about the trap handling toward the

Re: Notification log mib issues

2010-10-25 Thread Claus Klein
I really need an opinion about my questions to fix it in the right way. I have fixed it for v5.4.3 and plan to do it for 5.6 too. Regards, Claus On 20.10.2010, at 23:06, Claus Klein wrote: I have some question about the code at the end of this function: 1.) Why is the send_trap_to_sess()

Re: getnext (snmpwalk) does not deliver the hole table (snmpd5.4.3)

2010-10-25 Thread Thomas Anders
Claus Klein wrote: Please apply this patch and check the result about my FIXME notes. Please submit your patch to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches so it won't get lost. Patches that apply cleanly against SVN trunk usually have a higher chance to get accepted quickly. +Thomas

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19544] trunk/net-snmp

2010-10-25 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:10:16PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: Are you aware that r19544 modifies the Net-SNMP ABI ? and r19542 ... Argh, well, hmm, not really. Actually I never had the thought that these could be directly useful to external users, but only used internally by snmplib.

Re: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19542] trunk/net-snmp/snmplib/transports

2010-10-25 Thread Niels Baggesen
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:14:38PM +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote: Neither the description of r19542 nor the changes itself make sense to me. Sorry that I have already reverted these changes via r19546 without prior notice - if I had noticed earlier that the compiler warnings I encountered were