Den 01-12-2010 02:29, Wes Hardaker skrev:
>> On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:41:37 +0100, Magnus
>> Fromreide said:
>
> MF> Ok for trunk and V5-6?
>
> Applied for you :-)
So, now it fails linking because of a missing BIO_dgram_get_peer :-(
This is on CentOS 5.5 so maybe there should be a config
Hello,
How to resolve lldpRemChasisId , If lldpRemChasisIdSubType is 7 (any thing
which is locally defined in the remote system).
Main problem most of the devices having mac address (subtype 4) in this field.
But for special device it is not.
How to get OID of this variable.
Thanks ,
Sudheer
Den 02-12-2010 04:39, Robert Story skrev:
> MF> So the result of this is that the tunnel mib is unsupported on linux,
> MF> *bsd, solaris and darwin* nowadays.
>
> :-(
It DOES compile in my standard setup, which is CentOS and Ubuntu with (I
have a feeling that it uses ioctls which are Linux spe
On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 16:39:52 -0800 Judith wrote:
JW> I chose to implement one of my MIBs using a non-caching scheme with the
JW> mib2c and mdf configuration and all of that. Well, now since I chose not
JW> to do caching, I must call the container_load capabilities myself. So
JW> would some know
On Thu, 02 Dec 2010 01:57:55 +0100 Magnus wrote:
MF> Hello.
MF>
MF> I tried to compile with tunnel/tunnel.
MF>
MF> It failed as it wanted to dereference the symbol var_ifEntry.
MF>
MF> I then tried to compile with tunnel/tunnel and mibII/interfaces.
MF>
MF> That also failed but the failure was
Hello.
I tried to compile with tunnel/tunnel.
It failed as it wanted to dereference the symbol var_ifEntry.
I then tried to compile with tunnel/tunnel and mibII/interfaces.
That also failed but the failure was more interesting as
mibII/interfaces require if-mib/data_access/interface but
if-mib/
I chose to implement one of my MIBs using a non-caching scheme with the mib2c
and mdf configuration and all of that. Well, now since I chose not to do
caching, I must call the container_load capabilities myself. So would some
knowledgeable person please clue me in on where in the code to do
Den 01-12-2010 16:23, Wes Hardaker skrev:
> NB> Maybe it was just your magic typedefs that were more wacky than
> NB> magic?
>
> It was a patch from patch DB. (not my bad)
:-)
Looking further at it, I can see that much of this was older ...
The following patch, which I will commit in a moment
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2010 14:08:16 -0500, said:
> In release 5.6 is there a limit to the number of simultaneous DTLS
> connections a process can have? That is the number of bio_caches a
> process can have in memory?
Pretty much it's limited to memory. It could be optimized even further
in the f
In release 5.6 is there a limit to the number of simultaneous DTLS
connections a process can have? That is the number of bio_caches a
process can have in memory?
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance
Generally the Net-SNMP parser tries to be more lenient than strict.
Mostly because we like to try and load and use even broken MIBs to help
the end-users. However, MIB developers are very encouraged to make use
of a strict checker like smilint from the libsmi package when writing MIBs.
--
Wes H
> I had a bet with myself that some older system somewhere would choke.
> I won. Sigh.
NB> Older systems? CentOS 5.5 is still very much alive
True. my bad.
NB> Maybe it was just your magic typedefs that were more wacky than
NB> magic?
It was a patch from patch DB. (not my bad)
--
Wes H
Dear all:
The function getVarbinds(in parse.c) do not check the VB correct or not,
why?
Thanks.
--
Increase Visibility of Your 3D Game App & Earn a Chance To Win $500!
Tap into the largest installed PC base & get m
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 02:16:28PM -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I had a bet with myself that some older system somewhere would choke.
> I won. Sigh.
Older systems? CentOS 5.5 is still very much alive, both Ubuntu 10.10
and Redhat 6.0 uses __u32 etc. in their ethtool.h?
Maybe it was just your m
14 matches
Mail list logo
