> On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:59:25 -0500, Robert Story
> said:
RS> No, it doesn't, as the problem is that snmp.conf isn't being read. Adding
RS> clientaddr to snmpd.conf tokens isn't the right solution.
Note that putting the following in your snmpd.conf file will make it
work as is as well
The RMON support in Net-SNMP has never been fully vetted. There is some
base code in the agent/mibgroup/rmon directory that has never fully
worked. We keep hoping someone will pick it up and spend more time with
it (or rewrite it), but as of now the support isn't there.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please m
> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:28:05 +0100, Jan Safranek
> said:
JS> Well, I'd like to have working both, I have many customers who require
JS> responses to broadcast packets and other really weird stuff.
It's well worth noting that SNMP was *never* intended to respond to
broadcast SNMP requ
> On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:43:56 -0500, Robert Story
> said:
BF> (I've already diffed agent/mibgroup/agentx between 5.5 and 5.6, it's
BF> almost all cleanups that can't explain this; there's something more
BF> subtle going on somewhere.)
RS> Have you diffed the transport code too?
Um...
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:43:26 -0800 (PST), sujata patra
> said:
sp> I have implemented simple table quite a few times . But I am confused to
sp> implement when the mib contain more than one table and the tables are
sp> nested(means the second table data repeats for each row of firs
Niels Baggesen wrote:
> The following patch (for V5-6-patches and trunk) allows to configure
> with --disable-debugging
+1
+Thomas
--
Lotusphere 2011
Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how
to connect the dots,
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:44:39 +0100, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> If a consensus is reached to apply it then I would like to ask someone
MF> else to apply the patch as I might be connectivitywise challenged for a
MF> while.
+1 and applying for you.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all repl
Den 15-12-2010 04:27, [email protected] skrev:
> Dear Robert Story,
>
> Sorry for my mistake. It is joeTest.0. However, it still have a same
> problem.
Your function does not specify a return value, so it will be some random
value. You should normally return SNMP_ERR_NOE
Den 08-12-2010 22:29, Niels Baggesen skrev:
> The following patch (for V5-6-patches and trunk) allows to configure
> with --disable-debugging
Any additional votes? Or comments as to why not?
/Niels
--
Niels Baggesen - @home - Århus - Denmark - [email protected]
The purpose of computing
