On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 10:50, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders <
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> only be used for bug fixes at this point. Please give 5.10.pre1 a
> whirl -- it certainly won't be perfect yet.
>
I've built 5.10~pre1 using the Debian package setup, was a few patches
ID entries and
> would love to get any help on this issue.
>
> Is there another way to use more than 255 custom OID's?
>
> Thank You to anyone looking into this matter.
>
> - Neeraj
>
> On Mon, 29 Jul 2024 at 14:26, Craig Small wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 12 Jul 2024
On Mon, 16 Sept 2024 at 22:44, Teus Benschop wrote:
> The daemon kept the same ports open as before editing the snmpd.conf even
> in case some agentaddress entries were removed from snmpd.conf.
>
Some changes to the configuration file can be enabled with a reload or HUP
and some things need a com
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 at 08:31, Neeraj Bansal wrote:
> We recompile everything and install no problem, but instead of fixing our
> problem it caused net-snmp-5.9.3 to not be able to start. The error it gives
> is: Bad user id, which could be a red herring. example below:
> [root@testboard: /root#
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 16:05, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Something else must be going on. This is the code from configure.ac that
> checks for libnl-3:
>
> if test "x$ac_cv_header_netlink_netlink_h" = xyes; then
> AC_EGREP_HEADER([nl_socket_free], [netlink/socket.h],
>
On Wed, 3 Apr 2024 at 02:19, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Can you please check the configure script logs to see why libnl-3 was
> not detected?
>
libnl-3 was detected:
configure:27875: $PKG_CONFIG --exists --print-errors "libnl-3.0"
configure:27878: $? = 0
configure:27936: result: yes
But libnl-rout
3 and
libnl-route-3 development packages and remove --without-nl from the
configure options if necessary.
| ^
- Craig
--
Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/ csmall at : dropbear.xyz
Debian GNU/Linuxhttps://www.debian.org/
<http://www.debian.org/> csmall at : deb
ub.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/issues/752
--
Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/ csmall at : dropbear.xyz
Debian GNU/Linuxhttps://www.debian.org/
<http://www.debian.org/> csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 393
On Tue, 5 Sept 2023 at 22:16, Teus Benschop wrote:
> I could not find a way to display the port number, also not using the
> various debug tokens.
>
I ran snmpd as
snmpd -f -Le -Dnetsnmp_udp 2000,3000
and got
netsnmp_udp: recvfrom fd 6 got 41 bytes (from UDP:
[127.0.0.1]:36600->[127.0.0.1]:2000)
I asked the same thing a few weeks ago. Wes said he put the key on the mit
servers. I haven't checked that (or rc1 either).
Both are on my to-do list.
- Craig
On Wed, 12 July 2023, 19:12 Alexander Bergmann via Net-snmp-coders, <
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> Hi Wes / everyon
On Sat, 15 Apr 2023 at 11:12, Simon Chamlian wrote:
>
> snmptrap -v 3 -u Simon -a MD5 -A SimonPass -l authNoPriv 172.27.37.227
> "" coldStart.0
>
> I do receive the trap on my Trap Receiver even if I didn't specify a
> Username and Authentication password in the MIB browser (on 172.27.37.227 )
Hi Simon,
My understanding is the only way of adding the key is with the snmpusm
command. Except it doesn't work for me.
$ snmpusm -v3 -u simon -l authPriv -a SHA1 -A simon-pass -x AES128 -X
simon-priv localhost changekey simon
snmpusm:
Can't get diffie-helman exchange from the agent
(maybe it
Craig
--
Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/ csmall at : dropbear.xyz
Debian GNU/Linuxhttps://www.debian.org/
<http://www.debian.org/> csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
On Fri, 22 Jul 2022 at 17:54, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
> 06_extramibs.patch - which adds the Gnome MIB - touches on something I have
> pondering - how should a distribution add MIBs?
>
> On Debian we have this patch.
>
> On RedHat Net-SNMP ships one heap of MIBs and libsmi ships another,
> slightl
hey're the easiest for me).
I wasn't planning on sending all 43 and grouping some similar ones up,
starting with the simplest/least controversial ones.
- Craig
1: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/net-snmp/-/tree/master/debian/patches
--
Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 07:42, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders <
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> So a 5.9.3 release has now been pushed to:
>
Debian net-snmp packages 5.9.3-1 have also been built and uploaded.
No major issues, I'm hoping to reduce some of the patches I'm carrying
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 00:29, Paban Agarwalla
wrote:
> when we configure v3 users. Some of the algorithm combinations failed.
>
That's an odd result. It's like the authentication key length is having an
effect on the authentication key length you can use. If the auth key is
smaller than the priv
On Wed, 6 Jul 2022 at 01:54, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> How about also fixing the other two issues reported during the last 24
> hours by Craig before announcing 5.9.3.rc1?
>
While I am always happy to have fewer patches in the Debian source (and I'm
going to try to get some more into the upstream)
On Tue, 14 Jun 2022 at 21:12, Vivek Aditya wrote:
> Is there a way to encrypt passwords in the snmpd.conf file? Currently,
> when we open snmpd.conf file we can look at passwords in plaintext format,
> is there a way to store those passwords in encrypted form. Does net-snmp
> support any encrypti
Hi,
The default setup with 5 retries and 1 second delay would work if the
function works across requests. My guess is that the third request cannot
use the data from the first request.
The timeline would be something like (with a second gap between each line)
T0 - Request #1 - function #1 starts
On Wed, 27 Apr 2022 at 12:30, Paban Agarwalla
wrote:
> Would you please share some examples of context?
>
> snmpd.examples has some good, well, examples but a way of using contexts
for overlapping OIDs is below. This is for two agents using the proxy
method as its easier to see the results.
This
Hello again,
The issue was tied up with libtool and how Debian's is slightly
different. link_all_deplibs is set to no so you explicitly need to put the
libraries.
Anyway, the change was to add $(AGENTLIB) to the linker line for
libnetsnmptrapd in apps/Makefile.in
The result is I can Debian packa
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 at 07:11, Craig Small wrote:
> I'll run the source code through a standard Debian pbuilder and one with
> OpenSSL v3 added as well to check it works with both versions.
>
Standard Debian sid pbuilder came up with this error below.
convert_v1pdu_to_v2() and sen
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 10:09 Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders, <
net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
>
> Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
>
I can confirm that the compile issues with OpenSSL v3 are fixed with this.
I'll run the source code through a stan
and might miss some
subtle but important patch.
- Craig
1: https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/commits/V5-9-patches
--
Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/ csmall at : dropbear.xyz
Debian GNU/Linuxhttps://www.debian.org/
<http://www.debian.org/> csmall at
ned on the Wiki either.
- Craig
--
Craig Small https://dropbear.xyz/ csmall at : dropbear.xyz
Debian GNU/Linuxhttps://www.debian.org/
<http://www.debian.org/> csmall at : debian.org
GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 051
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 05:14, Feroz wrote:
> hi,
> Is it necessary to maintain any specific order in SNMP TRAP for varbinds?
>
For the first two, yes.
> e.g: "sysUpTime.0" should be the first one followed by "snmpTrapOID.0"
> then the actual data varbinds.
>
RFC 1905[1] section 4.2.6:
"The firs
ion(3) dod(6)
> internet(1) private(4) enterprise(1) cisco(9)
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.14832.1.3 : iso(1) org(3) dod(6) internet(1) private(4)
> enterprise(1) esoConsortiumMIB(14832)
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:07 AM Craig Small wrote:
>
>> Hi Pushpa,
>> It
ol
and use the same method for both values, but they don't.
- Craig
On Wed, 15 Sept 2021 at 15:44, Pushpa Thimmaiah
wrote:
> Hi Craig Small,
>
> Thank you . This is really helpful.
> If AES192 and AES192C are AES standard from different entity then are
> they interchan
Hi Pushpa,
As you have discovered, there are two AES192 standards.
When you select AES192 (with no C) this is the IETF draft Blumenthal
standard.
When you select AES192C this is the Cisco "standard".
What is the actual difference? As far as I can tell, it comes down to the
OID used for some of
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 20:28 Roberto A. Foglietta, <
roberto.foglie...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have been reported that the bottleneck is due to the single-thread
> nature of SNMP.
> The bottleneck is about 1 SNMP call served per second.
>
That sounds like asynchronous SNMP calls. The delay is due to
Hi Simon,
net-snmp-config is a shell script that literally prints $HOME/.snmp/mibs
snmpinform (or actually the snmp library) is a little more complicated with
a bunch of overrides.
So I'm trying to get what you see with:
# HOME=/home/root snmpinform -v 2c -c public -m blahmib 127.0.0.1 1 blahoi
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 01:59, Simon Chamlian wrote:
> When these flags (--with-security-modules and --with-transports) are not
> specified, what does snmpv3 uses by default?
>
The default set of security modules is defined in
configure.d/config_modules_security_modules and is just usm.
USM is th
On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 at 10:38, Michael Klett
wrote:
> We have decided to use Linux for our next project so I’m working on
> learning Linux at the same time that I’m tasked with adding our Enterprise
> MBs to the firmware of the new project. I have been Google-ing for days
> and my Google-Fu is si
The snmp create user command put this line in my /var/lib/snmp/snmpd.conf
createUser myuser MD5 "my_password" DES ""
I got in my logs:
Feb 02 11:44:02 floyd snmpd[1401586]: Error: passphrase chosen is below the
length requirements of the USM (min=8).
Feb 02 11:44:02 floyd snmpd[1401586]: /var/lib/
Hi,
Maybe have a look at the source to snmptrap to see how its done there?
snmp_send seems to be a fire and forget.
You probably want snmp_synch_response or to look how it does the select,
read and timeout functions and copy that.
- Craig
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 at 01:35, wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
he end result is "all outbound UDP use same SRC
> port".
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2021, 5:28 AM Craig Small wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 10:01, Ed Fair wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the reply. The Simple_Async_Application in your link uses
>>> one
On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 at 10:01, Ed Fair wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. The Simple_Async_Application in your link uses one
> session/socket/SRC port per agent. I've compiled and run this sample
> successfully, but I haven't been able to modify it to use a single
> session/socket/SRC port.
>
It migh
Hi,
Wouldn't asynchronous queries do what you need? See
http://net-snmp.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/TUT:Simple_Async_Application
I've written something similar but was using pysnmp and it seemed to do the
job. The trick is you also have to make sure you don't hammer the agent;
most agents ar
Hello Josh,
I am only the Debian packager of net-snmp not the "owner" of the
software. In fact it would be difficult to get one voice on the "owner" as
there are many including several organisations.
So, this is coming from a non-US citizen who hasn't written a line of
net-snmp but has written ot
Hi,
Even though the signature checks out, the archive seems to be corrupted.
$ tar tfz ~/Downloads/net-snmp-5.9.tar.gz >/dev/null
gzip: stdin: decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored
tar: Child returned status 2
tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
- Craig
_
On Fri, 21 Aug 2020 at 20:11, Craig Small wrote:
> gzip: stdin: decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored
> tar: Child returned status 2
> tar: Error is not recoverable: exiting now
I don't even know how vi does this, but:
net-snmp-5.9/ci/perl.bat
net-snmp-5.9/ci/build.sh
gzip
On Wed, 17 Jun 2020 at 16:33, SURYA T S wrote:
> Please help me to disable snmpv1 and v2 and enable only snmpv3.
> Can we do this from snmpd.conf?
>
Just don't define any snmp v1/v2c (lines like rocommunity and rwcomunity)
and use the SNMP user commands instead.
> Observed NETSNMP_DISABLE_SNMPV
On Thu, 11 Jun 2020 at 04:13, Yefetluzzatto, Inbal
wrote:
> ../include/net-snmp/library/snmpAAL5PVCDomain.h:18:17: fatal error: atm.h:
> No such file or directory
>
atm.h is a system library header. In Debian, you would find this in
libatm1-dev package which you would need to have installed for n
Hi,
I'm following up Debian bug report 685877 The main issue is tmpfs is
part of the HRFS_ignores array and so all tmpfs filesystems are
ignored and not displayed.
This was added by Niels Baggesen back in 2004 with commit
2dfdd7cb73ec8bc670888939568f2bfa49f73943 which seems to be just an
update
45 matches
Mail list logo
