On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:44:20 +0200, Bart Van Assche
bvanass...@acm.org said:
BVA What are the criteria for a prerelease ? I assume that the source code
BVA should at least build ? Currently both the MinGW
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 08:06:49 +0200, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org
said:
BVA Since the last time I fixed the MSVC and MinGW builds, these builds have
BVA been broken again by the recent changes in the transport implementation.
BVA These changes should not be reverted but the MSVC and MinGW
Several months ago i submitted a patch to the bug track.
The patch fixed a segmentation fault problem and wrong handling of error
messages.
You can see the details here:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2952766group_id=12694atid=112694
I've been using a netsnmp 5.5
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:45:55 +0200, Diego Billi dbi...@labs.it said:
DB Is this patch going to be included in the new 5.6 release? The SVN
DB sources do not contain the patch.
I'm behind in getting to applying all the needed patches, and I
apologize for that. I intend to review all the
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Wes Hardaker
harda...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:45:55 +0200, Diego Billi dbi...@labs.it
said:
DB Is this patch going to be included in the new 5.6 release? The SVN
DB sources do not contain the patch.
I'm behind in getting to
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:44:20 +0200, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org
said:
BVA What are the criteria for a prerelease ? I assume that the source
BVA code should at least build ? Currently both the MinGW and the MSVC
BVA builds are broken, and two Cygwin regression tests fail.
They should
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:44:20 +0200, Bart Van Assche bvanass...@acm.org
said:
BVA What are the criteria for a prerelease ? I assume that the source code
BVA should at least build ? Currently both the MinGW and the MSVC builds are
BVA broken, and two Cygwin regression tests fail.
The last
