On 20/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see more stuff, but no CPU stats.
>
> What's the output of
> net-snmp-config --snmpd-module-list | tr " " "\n" | grep cpu_
>
> ? ...cpu_sysctl? The content of agent/mibgroup/hardware/cpu.h vs. the comments
> in agent/mibgroup/hardware/cpu/
As I informed Wes a little while ago, I'm about to get onto a plane for a wilderness trip that will leave me without access. As a result, I won't have time to run the tests or do additional debugging until I return at the end of the month.See the message I posted on 17-Oct for addition informationO
Thomas Anders wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
>
>>On 10/10/06, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>6) SIGHUP errors
>>
>>Can someone please remind me as to exactly which config settings
>>trigger this problem.
>>I'd half-remembered that it hit a default build with a fairly vanilla
>>config fi
chris jalbert wrote:
> The Perl modules compile with my patches, but I haven't yet tried
> embedded Perl.
Please do and report the results of "make test" and "make perltest". We've had
at least two reports that the embedded perl tests fail on OSX. We'd like to turn
it off on OSX if it doesn't work
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 6) SIGHUP errors
>
> Can someone please remind me as to exactly which config settings
> trigger this problem.
> I'd half-remembered that it hit a default build with a fairly vanilla
> config file, but quick testing this mo
> "cj" == chris jalbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cj> Here's a patch (against the CVS repository) for README.osX that updates it
cj> with some of this information:
Applied.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
-
Using Tomcat
> "cj" == chris jalbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
cj> Test building embedded Perl
cj> Perl and embedded Perl both build. I do not know how to test them once
cj> installed.
make test:
38:testing snmpd embedded perl support (using NetSNMP::agent)...ok
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
---
On 17-Oct-2006, at 11:09 AM, chris jalbert wrote:Here are my work priorities for Net-SNMP on OS X: • Finalize Darwin 8 and 9 patchesPosted. • Test building embedded PerlPerl and embedded Perl both build. I do not know how to test them once installed. • Get CPU and memory stats workingA bunch of MIB
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 8) "as-needed" linking
>> Again, I haven't checked the relevant bugs, but this feels as
>> if it might
>> be a more significant issue than many of the others.
>> How damaging would it be to ship things as they currently stand?
TA> OSX is
On tis, 2006-10-10 at 20:15 +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> Which of these issues are show-stoppers, and which could (reluctantly)
> be left till 5.4.1?
> Over to you.
One thing that makes me anxious is that I failed to update
win32/libsnmp_dll/libsnmp.def with the functions from
include/net-snmp
On 17-Oct-2006, at 4:08 AM, Thomas Anders wrote:chris jalbert wrote: I finally got everything to build on Darwin 8 and 9, and they will require some slight differences in the platform headers which I need to break out (since I pass CFLAGS to configure to pick up the #defines) and post patches for.
On 17/10/06, chris jalbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am currently debugging the daemon to figure out why the cpu and memory
> stats aren't coming thru when I do a top-level snmpwalk, i.e. "snmpwalk -v
> 2c -c public localhost".
That will just walk the 'mib2' subtree - including the host reso
chris jalbert wrote:
> I finally got everything to build on Darwin 8 and 9, and they will
> require some slight differences in the platform headers which I need to
> break out (since I pass CFLAGS to configure to pick up the #defines) and
> post patches for.
This is still with embedded Perl and Pe
chris jalbert wrote:
> I am currently debugging the daemon to figure out why the cpu and memory
> stats aren't coming thru when I do a top-level snmpwalk, i.e. "snmpwalk
> -v 2c -c public localhost". (Network and disk data are returned,
> although some of the values are wrong.)
What exact tables a
On 10-Oct-2006, at 12:19 PM, Dave Shield wrote:On 10/10/06, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I offer the following list - complete with comments and strawmanproposals - for the purpose of stimulating debate: Argghh.I knew there was another issue I wanted to add:11) Darwin build Th
On 10/10/06, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 6) SIGHUP errors
Can someone please remind me as to exactly which config settings
trigger this problem.
I'd half-remembered that it hit a default build with a fairly vanilla
config file, but quick testing this morning didn't trigger anything.
On 10/10/06, Juergen Schoenwaelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> c) The opposite of b) would be to require that each transport provides
>its own check function in order to localize the problem. The proper
>way to do this would be to add a additional function pointer to the
>netsnmp_trans
On 12-Oct-2006, at 2:58 AM, Dave Shield wrote:On 11/10/06, chris jalbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll post these patches shortly; I haven't yet because I was still fighting with some of the build issues and I have to break them up. Patches posted. OK - now applied to the CVS repository. Note
On 10/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave Shield wrote:
> > 7) perl compiler warnings
> > If they're simply warnings (rather than errors), then leave till
> > 5.4.1
> > Unless they actually indicate a more serious problem?
>
> Compiler warnings often point to
On 11/10/06, chris jalbert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'll post these patches shortly; I haven't yet because I was still
>> fighting with some of the build issues and I have to break them up.
> Patches posted.
OK - now applied to the CVS repository.
Note that most of the hr_storage.c changes
Dnia wtorek, 10 października 2006 21:15, Dave Shield napisał:
> I've already re-categorised a couple of entries as not really relevant
> for 5.4, but we still have the following issues awaiting resolution.
> I offer the following list - complete with comments and strawman
> proposals - for the pur
On 11-Oct-2006, at 10:04 AM, chris jalbert wrote:On 10-Oct-2006, at 4:00 PM, Thomas Anders wrote:Dave Shield wrote:On 10/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:1) OpenBSD4 headersHuh? We neither have openbsd3.h nor openbsd4.h, but just openbsd.h.OK - in that case, I don't understand the com
On 10-Oct-2006, at 4:00 PM, Thomas Anders wrote:Dave Shield wrote: On 10/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 1) OpenBSD4 headers Huh? We neither have openbsd3.h nor openbsd4.h, but just openbsd.h. OK - in that case, I don't understand the comment "openbsd4 uses openbsd.h, and thus a
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 20:15:29 +0100 Dave wrote:
DS> 2) if-mib rewrite
DS> I believe Robert has already said that he plans a suitable
mechanism
DS> to enable this simply.
Yes. Checked in today.
-
Using Tomcat
On 10-Oct-2006, at 12:19 PM, Dave Shield wrote:On 10/10/06, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I offer the following list - complete with comments and strawman proposals - for the purpose of stimulating debate: Argghh. I knew there was another issue I wanted to add: 11) Darwin build
: Tue 10/10/2006 3:15 PM
To: net-snmp-coders
Subject: 5.4 Open Issues
I thought it might be worth trying to deal with (or at least come to
some consensus on) the various open issues for 5.4 - so we can
surprise Wes with a clean slate when he gets back from holiday. Well,
a man can dream, can'
Dave Shield wrote:
> On 10/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 1) OpenBSD4 headers
>
>> Huh? We neither have openbsd3.h nor openbsd4.h, but just openbsd.h.
>
> OK - in that case, I don't understand the comment
>"openbsd4 uses openbsd.h, and thus a lot of openbsd3 code
> th
On 10/10/06, Bruce Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >3) hrStorageIndexes
> Locking the beginning of the disk entries into index 30 assumes nobody would
> 'be stupid'/'is insane'/'has a server overworked' enough to have more than
> 29 swap entries. That's not a good assumption.
Agreed.
One appr
On 10/10/06, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 1) OpenBSD4 headers
> Huh? We neither have openbsd3.h nor openbsd4.h, but just openbsd.h.
OK - in that case, I don't understand the comment
"openbsd4 uses openbsd.h, and thus a lot of openbsd3 code
that most likely works on openbsd4
Dave Shield wrote:
> 1) OpenBSD4 headers
> What would be the implications of adding
>#include
> to openbsd4.h?
Huh? We neither have openbsd3.h nor openbsd4.h, but just openbsd.h.
I think we should come to a consensus whether foobar42
>3) hrStorageIndexes
I'm happy with the current state (unsurprisingly!),
though it's probably sensible to document the change. Any
objections?
Locking the beginning of the disk entries into index 30 assumes nobody would
'be stupid'/'is insane'/'has a server overworked' enough
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 08:15:29PM +0100, Dave Shield wrote:
> R1) TCP notifications
> This seems to be the biggy - at least it's the only entry
> categorised red.
> Do we agree that it needs to be fixed before release, or should it be
> re-graded yellow. If it stays
On 10/10/06, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I offer the following list - complete with comments and strawman
> proposals - for the purpose of stimulating debate:
Argghh.
I knew there was another issue I wanted to add:
11) Darwin build
There have been reports of the HAL CPU
I thought it might be worth trying to deal with (or at least come to
some consensus on) the various open issues for 5.4 - so we can
surprise Wes with a clean slate when he gets back from holiday. Well,
a man can dream, can't he?
I've already re-categorised a couple of entries as not really releva
34 matches
Mail list logo
