> On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:55:56 +0100, Dave Shield
> said:
DS> Having to maintain several versions of autoconf in parallel is
DS> something of a pain.
I agree it's a pain, though autoconf is such an easy tool to install
it's really not *that* bad.
What surprises me most is that I think
On 13 October 2010 23:18, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> MF> One big drawback is that AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION was introduced in 2.62
> MF> so any releases with a requirement below that can't use this.
>
> Yep, that's one of the reasons I went with the other way (at least for
> the older branches).
>
> Your way
> On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:41:25 +0200, Magnus Fromreide
> said:
MF> One big drawback is that AC_AUTOCONF_VERSION was introduced in 2.62
MF> so any releases with a requirement below that can't use this.
Yep, that's one of the reasons I went with the other way (at least for
the older branc
Is this patch reasonable or just plain stupid?
Index: configure.ac
===
--- configure.ac(revision 19427)
+++ configure.ac(working copy)
@@ -11,7 +11,8 @@
# Process this file with autoconf to produce a configure script.
