On Thu, 09 Sep 2010 09:49:52 -0700 Wes wrote:
WH> JW> I can collect these metrics into Count32 and Count64 variables
WH> JW> respectively, but management systems using these MIBs will see
WH> JW> rollovers at 29 and 48. Is this acceptable?
WH>
WH> No, unfortunately, it is not. The management sta
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 10:22:13 -0700, Judith Walker
> said:
JW> Thanks to the responder (Wes). It's not the answer that I wanted to
JW> hear, but I greatly appreciate the response, regardless.
Well, glad to be of help. Unfortunately that's the only answer the SNMP
protocol allows for :
Thanks to the responder (Wes). It's not the answer that I wanted to hear, but
I greatly appreciate the response, regardless.
Judy
--
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:
Show off your parallel programming skills.
JW> I can collect these metrics into Count32 and Count64 variables
JW> respectively, but management systems using these MIBs will see
JW> rollovers at 29 and 48. Is this acceptable?
No, unfortunately, it is not. The management station will get skewed
data it doesn't expect if you do it that way
I have a question with respect to counters in SNMP and the rollover of
counters. If anyone can point me to a precedence or recommendation for the
metrics reporting that I intend to do, I would be very grateful.
I'm writing a MIB that supports reports metrics from hardware/firmware. Since
hard
