RE: Security Posture in net-snmp

2009-04-13 Thread Mike Ayers
> From: Pachiappan D [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, April 13, 2009 8:58 AM > I am extending the net-snmp agent (5.4.1). > > > RFC 3414 allows the following security postures , > 1. minimum-secure > > 2.semi-secure > 3.very-secure

Re: Security Posture in net-snmp

2009-04-13 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2009 20:38:16 +0530, Pachiappan D > said: PD> RFC 3414 allows the following security postures , PD> 1. minimum-secure PD> 2.semi-secure PD> 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration) Be default we have no configuration of either snmpv3 users or snmpv1/v2c community n

Re: Security Posture in net-snmp

2009-04-13 Thread Pachiappan D
Can anyone please advice me on this ? -Pachi- On 4/8/09, Pachiappan D wrote: > > Hi, > I am extending the net-snmp agent (5.4.1). > > RFC 3414 allows the following security postures , > 1. minimum-secure > 2.semi-secure > 3.very-secure (i.e., no-initial-configuration) > > May i know the security