Re: 5.8 testing status

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 5:20 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Fri, 4 May 2018 11:25:35 -0400 Bill wrote: > BF> My proposed fix works for my trapsess case, so I guess that's > BF> something. Should I commit the broken tests so anyone else who > BF> wants to try to fix the

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Fri, 4 May 2018 11:25:35 -0400 Bill wrote: BF> I started writing a test for this, and found that it's seriously BF> convoluted. The combination of clientaddr + trap*sink results BF> in the bind() attempting to use port 161 for the clientaddr, so BF> it doesn't work as non-root (in the test

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Bill Fenner wrote: > Should I commit the broken tests so anyone else who wants to try to fix > the trap*sink code has a starting point? > > Here are the tests: https://github.com/fenner/net-snmp/compare/master...fenner:trapsourcetests?expand=1

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 12:08 AM, Robert Story wrote: > On Thu, 3 May 2018 14:32:40 -0400 Bill wrote: > BF> > On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote: > BF> > BF> I just filed > BF> > BF> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ : > BF> > BF> "clientaddr" doesn't

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Thu, 3 May 2018 14:32:40 -0400 Bill wrote: BF> > On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote: BF> > BF> I just filed BF> > BF> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ : BF> > BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for BF> > BF> traps any more. (And given that the code

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote: > BF> I just filed https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ : > BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for traps > BF> any more. (And given that the

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Wed, 2 May 2018 11:08:44 -0400 Bill wrote: BF> I just filed https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ : BF> "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for traps BF> any more. (And given that the code path is the same, I suspect BF> it doesn't work for client requests either).

Re: 5.8 testing status

I just filed https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/bugs/2864/ : "clientaddr" doesn't work to set the source address for traps any more. (And given that the code path is the same, I suspect it doesn't work for client requests either). This is a regression against 5.7.3; that code has been

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Sun, 29 Apr 2018 12:10:12 -0400 Bill wrote: BF> BF> It's plausible that a workaround as simple as BF> > BF> BF> > BF> +/* BF> > BF> + * We lie about being SNMPv3, because ... BF> > BF> + */ BF> > BF> if (add_trap_session(main_session, BF> > BF> AGENTX_MSG_NOTIFY, 1, BF> > BF>

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 6:36 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:07:27 -0400 Bill wrote: > BF> >>> (The context is that the library now tries to suppress > BF> >>> converting traps from v1 to v2 or vice versa if there is no > BF> >>> trap sink of the right type,

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Thu, 26 Apr 2018 22:07:27 -0400 Bill wrote: BF> >>> (The context is that the library now tries to suppress BF> >>> converting traps from v1 to v2 or vice versa if there is no BF> >>> trap sink of the right type, but, it does not know how to BF> >>> treat agentx sessions so doesn't count them -

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:00 PM, Bill Fenner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Bart Van Assche > wrote: > >> On 04/26/18 04:57, Bill Fenner wrote: >> >>> A new feature went into 5.8 that conflicts a little with using an agentx >>> subagent. I

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 10:02 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/26/18 04:57, Bill Fenner wrote: > >> A new feature went into 5.8 that conflicts a little with using an agentx >> subagent. I mentioned this here: >> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/36270409/

Re: 5.8 testing status

On 04/26/18 04:57, Bill Fenner wrote: A new feature went into 5.8 that conflicts a little with using an agentx subagent.  I mentioned this here: https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/36270409/ You can replicate it by configuring a normal snmpd as an agentx master, and then

Re: 5.8 testing status

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Keith Mendoza wrote: > Just want to see where everyone is regarding 5.8 release. Other than > what's listed in the 5.8pre2 announcement are there any other features that > will go into 5.8? > > Other that the bugs I filed last week from running