Re: Agent Extension

Hi, attaching to arbitrary port works fine. The problem requires implementing snmp_add_full with respective routines, which doesn't work. Here is the code (for transport) ptp_tr = netsnmp_transport_open_server("agentx", "ptpext"); ... (for session) main_session = snmp_add_full(&def_sess, ptp_tr,

Re: Agent Extension

On 28/11/2007, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > main_session = snmp_add_full(&def_sess, ptp_tr, NULL, ptpagentx_parse, >NULL, NULL, NULL, ptpagentx_checkpacket, NULL); The seventh parameter is the routine called to encode the request into a data packet - ready for sending out over the network. If

Re: Agent Extension

On 13/11/2007 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And how is the procedure of integrating this to the agent. Just by calling > the mentioned routines or should provide the adding by ./configure before > installation too. Fundamentally, all you need to do is add the relevant code files to the build proces

Re: Agent Extension

And how is the procedure of integrating this to the agent. Just by calling the mentioned routines or should provide the adding by ./configure before installation too. Please explain the steps as follow. Kujtim > On 26/10/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> there was nothing h

Re: agent extension problem

On 02/11/2007, wqs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've written a MIB and used mib2c to generate the c template. > After modify,configure,make,make install,I ran the command: >"snmpwalk -m ALL -c public -v2c localhost sysConfigMib" , > and gotSYS-CONFIG-MIB::sysConfigMib = > No more varia

Re: Agent Extension

On 26/10/2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > there was nothing helpful in snmplib/fd_event_manager.c > Since the routines are original and there is no example, please send the > simplest example, where it implements register_{read,write}fd(). > I must implement sending the (new pro

Re: Agent Extension

Hi Dave, there was nothing helpful in snmplib/fd_event_manager.c Since the routines are original and there is no example, please send the simplest example, where it implements register_{read,write}fd(). I must implement sending the (new protocol!) messages via agent. Waiting for answer! Kujtim

Re: Agent Extension

Hi again and thanks for answering. > Alternatively, if your protocol doesn't match SNMP sufficiently > to fit into the netsnmp_pdu structure, then you can use the ... the protocol is totally different from SNMP - PTP (Precision Time Protocol) defined by IEEE-1588 standard. It's data management sid

Re: Agent Extension

On 24/09/2007, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > how to extent the agent to support new user defined protocol, other than > 1, 2c and 3. There are two possibilities. If the new protocol is similar to SNMP, then you need to: - provide a routine to take an incoming request, and parse

Re: Agent Extension

Dave Shield actually answered this another thread (agent example puzzle) and it turned out to be access control.On Apr 8, 2005 12:08 PM, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:52:30 -0400 John wrote:JP> snmpget -c public -v 1 localhost nstAgentModuleObject.0JP> Error in packet

Re: Agent Extension

On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 12:52:30 -0400 John wrote: JP> snmpget -c public -v 1 localhost nstAgentModuleObject.0 JP> Error in packet JP> Reason: (noSuchName) There is no such variable name in this MIB. JP> Failed object: NET-SNMP-TUTORIAL-MIB::nstAgentModuleObject.0 Did you configure the nstAgentModuleOb

Re: Agent Extension

quot; will > > help you with command related stuff. > > > > Bernhard > > > > > -Original Message----- > > > From: John Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Montag, 04. April 2005 16:57 > > > To: [email protected]

Re: Agent Extension

MIBS=ALL"? "man snmp.conf" and "man snmpcmd" will > help you with command related stuff. > > Bernhard > > > -Original Message- > > From: John Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Montag, 04. April 2005 16:57 > > To: net-sn

Re: Agent Extension

On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 02:08, John Pfaff wrote: > I generated my code with mib2c -c mib2c.int_watch.conf my-mib.txt. > I do ./configure --with-mib-modules="my-mib" I see .o files, so I > know it's getting compiled, but when I do snmpget all I get is > noSuchName. Have you tried working through th

RE: Agent Extension

Hi, Do you say "export MIBS=ALL"? "man snmp.conf" and "man snmpcmd" will help you with command related stuff. Bernhard > -Original Message- > From: John Pfaff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 04. April 2005 16:57 > To: net-snmp-coders@

Re: Agent Extension

Also, I tried using the nstAgentModuleObject and can't get a response for it either. On Apr 4, 2005 10:21 AM, John Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's in /usr/share/snmp/mibs with all of the other mibs. I can do > snmptranslate and see it just fine. > > On Apr 4, 2005 1:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Agent Extension

It's in /usr/share/snmp/mibs with all of the other mibs. I can do snmptranslate and see it just fine. On Apr 4, 2005 1:16 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Have you included MIB file to the right place? try use OID number to see if > you can get the data. > > -res > > - Ori

Re: Agent Extension

Have you included MIB file to the right place? try use OID number to see if you can get the data. -res - Original Message - From: "John Pfaff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Sunday, April 03, 2005 6:08 PM Subject: Agent Extension I'm sure there's probably a step I'm missing, but I can'

Re: Agent Extension: help

On 14 Sep 2004 13:00:41 +0530 Divakar wrote: DY> I'm working on QNX 4.25 and TCP/IP 5.0. DY> We use Watcom 10.6 compiler and we recently got the source code of snmp DY> from QSS. Then you will have to contact them for support. We only support Net-SNMP here. -- Robert Story; NET-SNMP Junkie

Re: agent extension MIB

> On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:35:25 +0100, Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: Dave> On balance, I'd still prefer to change the behaviour immediately, Dave> but I can well understand the reasons to proceed more cautiously. Dave> Would you be happy with deprecating this in 5.2 and dropping it in 5

RE: agent extension MIB

I'm still here. I'm just kinda stumped (and busy) at the moment. >Majority support? Hah! >There seems to be a general lack of interest in any aspect of the development of this package at the moment :-( >I'm going through another phase of wondering how long we'll be able to continue to keep it g

Re: agent extension MIB

On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 10:35:25 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> > My proposal: DS> > DS> > 1) new token for new mib ('extend'?) DS> > 2) document new token in man page. Mark old option as deprecated DS> > 3) optionally log warning at startup for old token DS> > 4) in a future release, drop old token su

Re: agent extension MIB

Robert> I'd say there should be a configure option to choose the new/old Robert> style implementation. Dave> configure --with-mib-modules=ucd-snmp/extensible Robert> I assume that this would enable the old-style? Yup Robert> And the new style has a new name? Or is in a new directory?

Re: agent extension MIB

On Tue, 08 Jun 2004 09:58:23 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> It's clearly premature for us to stop shipping these files with DS> the source distribution. What I'm really suggesting is to DS> omit this module from the default configuration. DS> It would still be available, but you'd have to ask for it expl

Re: agent extension MIB

DS> The reason I'm mentioning it here, is to float the idea of dropping DS> the 'ucd-snmp/extensible' module completely - as from v5.2 RS> Gack! I don't like the sound of that at all! OK - that was probably badly phrased (and badly thought through). It's clearly premature for us to stop shipping

Re: agent extension MIB

On Mon, 07 Jun 2004 17:00:09 +0100 Dave wrote: DS> The reason I'm mentioning it here, is to float the idea of dropping DS> the 'ucd-snmp/extensible' module completely - as from v5.2 Gack! I don't like the sound of that at all! DS> The advantage of doing so is that it avoids the need to have two D

Re: agent extension MIB

Those of you who follow activity on the CVS main branch may have noticed that I've been working on a re-implementation of the old UCD-SNMP-MIB::extTable - taking the same basic idea but making it somewhat more flexible. Up to now, this has been a completely new MIB (NET-SNMP-EXTEND-MIB), but I've