Hey Sriram,
I'm not sure what you mean by HTTP. If you mean WBEM (Web Based Enterprise
Management) then you will notice that WBEM borrows many concepts from SNMP
(such as TRAPS - called Indications), has a migration path to SNMP and
fulfills a lot more of the demands in managing heterogenous
s
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:14:38 +0530, JOJAN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
JOJAN> SNMP interface is useful for programs, but the HTTP interface
JOJAN> is useful mostly for human beings. That means, there is scope
JOJAN> for automation in the case of SNMP.
Exactly. Try to envision configuring/mana
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 13:52, Sriram venkat wrote:
>There and 2 protocols that are used in network management products.
> They are SNMP and HTTP.
Those two protocols could certainly be used to transmit
network management information across the network. But
that's probably about as much as they
: Monday, April 11, 2005 2:34 PMTo:
Sriram venkat; [email protected]: Re:
Snmp vs HTTP
Venkat,
I guess its basically the type of interface
u want to use to manage ur network elements.
HTTP provides u the GUI, the snmp stack like the
net-snmp software
Venkat,
I guess its basically the type of interface u
want to use to manage ur network elements.
HTTP provides u the GUI, the snmp stack like the
net-snmp software provides a strong CLI(command line interface).
however u can also use the tkmib browser,provided
with net-snmp to get a feel of
On 11/04/2005 14:33:41, Divakar.Y wrote:
>
> I guess its basically the type of interface u want to use to manage ur
> network elements.
> HTTP provides u the GUI, the snmp stack like the net-snmp software provides a
> strong CLI(command line interface).
No, HTML provides the interface. HTTP can
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 05:52:42AM -0700, Sriram venkat wrote:
> Hi,
>I have some basic questions regarding network management.
>
>There and 2 protocols that are used in network management products. They
> are SNMP and HTTP.
>
>
> What is the difference between them as far as networ
