On Sat, 8 Mar 2025 at 10:50, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders <
[email protected]> wrote:
> only be used for bug fixes at this point. Please give 5.10.pre1 a
> whirl -- it certainly won't be perfect yet.
>
I've built 5.10~pre1 using the Debian package
.
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
On 3/10/25 4:27 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
gnugk:
snmp.cxx:87:11: error: expected '(' for function-style cast or type construction
trapOID[ OID_LENGTH(trapOID) - 1 ] = trapNumber;
^~~
/usr/local/include/net-snmp/library/asn1.h:65:56: note
*session_ptr;
+ decltype(snmp_sess_open(NULL)) session_ptr;
SNMPSession();
~SNMPSession();
diff --git a/src/SNMP.cpp b/src/SNMP.cpp
index 1763bcac5175..f97e4969a432 100644
--- a/src/SNMP.cpp
+++ b/src/SNMP.cpp
@@ -453,13 +453,16 @@ bool SNMP::send_snmp_request(char *agent_host,
u_int version
On 3/10/25 4:27 AM, Stuart Henderson wrote:
To see how things are going with API changes, I've tested building
everything in OpenBSD ports which depends on this. (I'm not suggesting
that Net-SNMP needs to change anything unless these are unexpected, but
at least giving other package m
; (aka 'const unsigned long[10]')
snmpSession->session.securityAuthProto = usmHMACMD5AuthProtocol;
After having taken a closer look at the ntopng source code, how about
submitting the following (untested) patch to the ntopng project? This
patch should be backwards compatible.
On 2025/03/07 15:34, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
>
> Greetings all,
>
> It's been a while --- time to finally release a 5.10 pre-release
> candidate. Consider this a feature freeze and the master branch should
> only be used for bug fixes at this point.
lease mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Hi,
In TCPDUMP we are receiving packets but Net-SNMP Trap is processing some
of them and dropping some of them.
This scenario is happening for the same SNMP Agent.
SNMP V3 Config:- /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf
OS:- RHEL 8
Net-SNMP version:-5.8
Regards
Mohd Rafeeq Siddiquie
cket_free) test, that's a symptom.
I'm not sure if the older library needs the route library or not, so the
next steps are hard to say.
If it was just the new library then a fatal error on Linux for the absence
of either libnl3 or libnl-route-3 would do it.
______
P_HEADER([nl_socket_free], [netlink/socket.h],
[AC_DEFINE([HAVE_LIBNL3], [1],
[Define to 1 if
provides the
libnl3 API])])
fi
Thanks,
Bart.
___
Net-snmp-
ript, because it
evaluates
libnl-3 + !libnl-route-3 = libnl1
instead of failing.
- Craig
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
On 4/2/24 01:49, Craig Small via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
Hello All,
I was attempting to compile the git head of net-snmp. One big change
is that uses netlink sockets instead of reading /proc/net/*
The issue is the API is different to the library I can see.
mibgroup/mibII/tcpTable.c:631:12
Hello All,
I was attempting to compile the git head of net-snmp. One big change is
that uses netlink sockets instead of reading /proc/net/*
The issue is the API is different to the library I can see.
mibgroup/mibII/tcpTable.c:631:12: error: too few arguments to function
‘nl_geterror’
631
Hi Team,
I am currently working on NET-SNMP code integration for a project.
I want to understand the code changes for this CVE-2008-6123.
Can someone please point to the change list for same?
-Sukeerthi
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders
Hi,
I managed to do a secure DTLS comm between my laptop (snmpget) and my embedded
device net-snmp agent.
But I noticed there's somewhere a memory leak on the Agent (embedded device)
side : I see some 12KB amount of memory taken by the agent each time it
successfully handles such request
it does not work. It's a pretty small code
> change. Please take a look at the commit message for the logic and to
> understand the exact use-case where it isn't working. Any help or
> suggestion is appreciated.
>
> review link - https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/pull/
. Any help or
suggestion is appreciated.
review link - https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/pull/769
On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 at 22:52, Wes Hardaker
wrote:
> Vivek Aditya writes:
>
> > I want the SNMP to start listening on a new agent port without restart.
> > Just sending S
Vivek Aditya writes:
> I want the SNMP to start listening on a new agent port without restart.
> Just sending SIGHUP to snmpd does not work.
>
> Is there a way to do it or has this issue already been fixed? Any help
> would be appreciated.
That's a good feature request,
Hi Team,
I want the SNMP to start listening on a new agent port without restart.
Just sending SIGHUP to snmpd does not work.
Is there a way to do it or has this issue already been fixed? Any help
would be appreciated.
--
Warm Regards,
Vivek Aditya
;> While upgrading from NETsnmp 5.7.3 to 5.9.3 I encounter a problem which
>> is that root(/) filesystem is missing from UCD-SNMP-MIB disk table:
>
> Is https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/pull/764 perhaps intended as a
> fix for this issue?
>
Yes the issue disappears with t
On 12/17/23 09:51, Christophe Leroy wrote:
While upgrading from NETsnmp 5.7.3 to 5.9.3 I encounter a problem which
is that root(/) filesystem is missing from UCD-SNMP-MIB disk table:
Is https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp/pull/764 perhaps intended as a
fix for this issue?
Thanks,
Bart
Hello All,
While upgrading from NETsnmp 5.7.3 to 5.9.3 I encounter a problem which
is that root(/) filesystem is missing from UCD-SNMP-MIB disk table:
# snmpwalk -v1 -c public localhost 1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.9
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskIndex.2 = INTEGER: 2
UCD-SNMP-MIB::dskIndex.3 = INTEGER: 3
UCD-SNMP-MIB
Hi net-snmp-coders,We are net-snmp 5.9.1 with proxy. We use context to associate user/view/community and the context is based on the view (one view will have one corresponding context)But we would like to hide the context from SNMP client.The snmpd.conf is like this:proxy -Cn context_vt1 -v 2c -t
n the end, we've decided to table the fix until after 5.9.4 to
get this out the door as is for now.
NEWS for 5.9.4:
*5.9.4*:
IMPORTANT: SNMP over TLS and/or DTLS are not functioning properly
in this release with various versions of OpenSSL and will be fixed
in a future release.
Alexander Bergmann writes:
> Hi Craig,
>
> Thanks for the reply. Any update on your search for the GPG signing
> key?
Sorry fro the delay. I just put a new file in:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp-admin%20PGP%20key/current-key/
Specifically, the net-snmp
ame thing a few weeks ago. Wes said he put the key on the mit
> servers. I haven't checked that (or rc1 either).
>
> Both are on my to-do list.
>
> - Craig
>
>
> On Wed, 12 July 2023, 19:12 Alexander Bergmann via Net-snmp-coders, <
> net-snmp-coders@lists
I asked the same thing a few weeks ago. Wes said he put the key on the mit
servers. I haven't checked that (or rc1 either).
Both are on my to-do list.
- Craig
On Wed, 12 July 2023, 19:12 Alexander Bergmann via Net-snmp-coders, <
[email protected]> wrote
Hi Wes / everyone,
Where can I find the current GPG signing key that was used to sign the
latest updates?
gpg: assuming signed data in 'net-snmp-5.9.4.rc1.tar.gz'
gpg: Signature made Thu 22 Jun 2023 05:15:02 PM CEST
gpg:using EDDSA key 6E6718AEF1EB5C65C32D1B2A356BC0B552
ng:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.4-pre-releases/
As a reminder, all patches from here out to the V5-9 branch must have
discussion on -coders first, with at least 3 people in favor of applying
them. Additionally, any code changes will likely cause another rc
candidate
Hi Kuldeep,
Thank you.
Unfortunately, I didnot capture packets, but there was engineID missing on
SNMP manager during the test. I fixed that and noticed no snmpinforms
then. So checked at snmp-agent side and noticed that snmptrap is stuck.
Does 'snmptrap' not timeout if there is n
e_cb()` function in the
> `snmp_client.c` file. The `state->waiting` flag is set to 1, indicating
> that it is waiting for a response.
>
> To troubleshoot this issue, you can follow these steps:
>
> 1. Check the SNMP configuration: Ensure that the SNMP configuration on the
> devic
locals.
(gdb)
--
Thanks,
Pushpa.T
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Version 5.9.4.pre3 has been released and published to:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.4-pre-releases/
Please test away and report any critical issues. Ideally, this should
be the last pre-release and we'll publish a release candidate in a
couple of wee
We've started the process of creating a 5.9.4 release. Please test and
file pull requests when you run into problems you can fix.
tar/zips are available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.4-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 11:17:07AM +, Jendal, Bhanu wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> Can you please help on the below scenario:
> Need solution to suppress Warning for 32 bit net-SNMP installing on 64 bit
> while installing through the command line.
The net-snmp project primarily
Hello Team,
Can you please help on the below scenario:
Need solution to suppress Warning for 32 bit net-SNMP installing on 64 bit
while installing through the command line.
Regards,
Bhanu Jendal
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-coders
backward compatibily.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Abhishek Singh writes:
> 1. The issue was existing snmpv3 details were not updated in the net-snmp
> cache.
> Used clear_user_list() to clear users details. The patch is in attachments. Is
> this the correct way to go forward?
If you're always trying to re-create users th
Hi Bart,
The changes look great. Go ahead with the merge to master.
Hayden
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 2:39 PM Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 7/28/22 20:48, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On 7/27/22 09:27, Hayden Roche wrote:
> >> A while back, we (wolfSSL) added support for wolfSSL
Hello,
I have a requirement not to restart snmpd for SNMP config changes.
Am using the SIGHUP signal to reread for any snmp configuration changes.
I was facing two issues while using SIGHUP.
1. The issue was existing snmpv3 details were not updated in the net-snmp
cache. Used clear_user_list() to
On 7/28/22 20:48, Bart Van Assche wrote:
On 7/27/22 09:27, Hayden Roche wrote:
A while back, we (wolfSSL) added support for wolfSSL to net-snmp 5.9.1
for a
customer. You can find the patch here:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/osp/tree/master/net-snmp
Is this something you'd be interest
On 7/27/22 09:27, Hayden Roche wrote:
A while back, we (wolfSSL) added support for wolfSSL to net-snmp 5.9.1
for a
customer. You can find the patch here:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/osp/tree/master/net-snmp
Is this something you'd be interested in having upstream?
Support for wolfSSL se
Hi,
The 5.9.3 release fixes several security issues. Could someone confirm
if it was only the following two patches that fixed it, or give me a list
of the patches if not?
snmpd: fix bounds checking in NET-SNMP-AGENT-MIB, NET-SNMP-VACM-MIB,
SNMP-VIEW-BASED-ACM-MIB, SNMP-USER-BASED-SM-MIB
https
Hi,
A while back, we (wolfSSL) added support for wolfSSL to net-snmp 5.9.1 for a
customer. You can find the patch here:
https://github.com/wolfSSL/osp/tree/master/net-snmp
Is this something you'd be interested in having upstream?
Best,
Hayden
Craig Small writes:
> Debian net-snmp packages 5.9.3-1 have also been built and uploaded.
Nice, thanks.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
Net-snmp-cod
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 07:42, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> So a 5.9.3 release has now been pushed to:
>
Debian net-snmp packages 5.9.3-1 have also been built and uploaded.
No major issues, I'm hoping to reduce som
So a 5.9.3 release has now been pushed to:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.3/
This fixes the last minute bug with .so library naming in 5.9.2.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
To fix the discovered shared library versioning issue in 5.9.2,
5.9.3.rc1 has been published and is here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.3-pre-releases/
Please give it a whirl, with the goal of proper 5.9.3 being published
next week.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail
version numbers. Am I perhaps missing something?
Thanks,
Bart.
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Bart Van Assche writes:
> +1 for releasing the next version from the master branch. That would
> make Net-SNMP easier to maintain since it would reduce the number of
> branches to maintain from two to one.
Agreed, though typically we'd fork after that point with a patches
bran
On 6/30/22 19:23, Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders wrote:
I'm thinking we should look toward a main-branch release next (5.10).
Opinions welcome.
+1 for releasing the next version from the master branch. That would
make Net-SNMP easier to maintain since it would reduce the number of
bra
I'll send a full announcement early next week, but Net-SNMP 5.9.2 is
published and is at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2/
I'm thinking we should look toward a main-branch release next (5.10).
Opinions welcome.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all repl
There have only been a few changes since rc1, but enough that it
warrants another rc2. Please propose no changes at this point unless
there is a critical issue.
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2-pre-releases/
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-snmp
Greetings all,
An RC1 candidate is available for download and testing:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2-pre-releases/
If there are no proposed changes to this, it'll be 5.9.2 next. As a
reminder, in the RC phase of development, any proposed changes (from
a
Craig Small writes:
> However, net-snmp v 5.9.1 doesn't have all of these yet. I can either
> try to pick the relevant ones out and patch the Debian package, or
> wait until 5.9.2 comes out. My question is, is there an idea when that
> would be? My preference is to not patch
ply it.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
d64.deb
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.33), libpci3 (>= 1:3.5.1), libperl5.34 (>= 5.34.0),
libsensors5 (>= 1:3.5.0), *libssl3* (>= 3.0.1-1), libwrap0 (>= 7.6-4~),
libsnmp-base
- Craig
_______
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
Craig
libtool: compile: gcc -I../include -I. -I../agent -I../agent/helpers
-I../agent/mibgroup -I../snmplib -I/usr/include/mariadb/ -Wdate-time
-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -O2
"-ffile-prefix-map=/build/net-snmp-5.9.2~pre1+dfsg=."
-fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=fo
Craig Small writes:
> On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 10:09 Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders,
>
> wrote:
>
> Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
>
> I can confirm that the compile issues with OpenSSL v3 are fixed with this.
>
> I'
On Wed, 6 Apr 2022, 10:09 Wes Hardaker via Net-snmp-coders, <
[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
>
I can confirm that the compile issues with OpenSSL v3 are fixed with this.
I'll run the s
Greetings all,
Net-SNMP 5.9.2.pre1 has been published for testing as available at:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.2-pre-releases/
Please file any issues or pull requests required to improve the state of
this release.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to
(+Wes)
On 3/21/22 23:08, Craig Small wrote:
I received a bug report about issues linking net-snmp with openssl
v3. Generally its because there are functions referenced that were
deprecated in 3.0 or even sometimes 1.1.0 !
I started looking around and found that net-snmp already has some, if
On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 at 07:41, Craig Small wrote:
> Hi,
> I received a bug report about issues linking net-snmp with openssl v3.
> Generally its because there are functions referenced that were deprecated
> in 3.0 or even sometimes 1.1.0 !
>
> I started looking around and f
Hi,
I received a bug report about issues linking net-snmp with openssl v3.
Generally its because there are functions referenced that were deprecated
in 3.0 or even sometimes 1.1.0 !
I started looking around and found that net-snmp already has some, if not
all, the patches required. such as
Hi Mike
Thanks to reply. Can u explain little bit more on this, I need to log rotation
verbose for windows OS on net-snmp.
Thanks
Suresh
From: Mike Eggleston
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2022 7:19 PM
To: Suresh
Cc: [email protected]
; net-snmp
Hi Anyone able enable logging with verbose and log rotations in net-snmp daemon.
from snmpd.conf
From: Suresh
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 7:48 PM
To: [email protected]
; [email protected]
Subject: How to enable logging
Hello
I'm using net-snmp version: 5.9.1 service with extended my enterprise specific
mibs for snmpwalk/get/set
I want enable logs with rotation policy and verbose level.
Example
Log file name rataiotn with date_time and verbose leve debug, error level or
info level.
What parameter i ne
").
(c) reworking snmpusm.c to use a hash-table of lists, instead of just
one (struct usmUser *) list. This was a bigger change, but it was
also a _breaking_ change because there is an SNMP v3 agent table that
expects a certain ordering here. I think the right compromise might
be to use a
Charles Polisher writes:
> I found a bug in snmp-bridge-mib that causes incorrect results
> when the number of bridge ports exceeds one digit, because a
> string compare is used on numeric data.
Thanks, applied!
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
Hello,
I found a bug in snmp-bridge-mib that causes incorrect results
when the number of bridge ports exceeds one digit, because a
string compare is used on numeric data. The fix, tested, is below.
I hope this helps!
Best regards, and thanks to all the maintainers,
--
Charles Polisher
$ diff
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 6:01 PM Fulko Hew wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 5:23 PM Craig Small wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 05:14, Feroz wrote:
>>
>>> hi,
>>> Is it necessary to maintain any specific order in SNMP TRAP for varbinds?
>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 5:23 PM Craig Small wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 05:14, Feroz wrote:
>
>> hi,
>> Is it necessary to maintain any specific order in SNMP TRAP for varbinds?
>>
> For the first two, yes.
>
I always followed the principles of:
1/ least surp
On Fri, 29 Oct 2021 at 05:14, Feroz wrote:
> hi,
> Is it necessary to maintain any specific order in SNMP TRAP for varbinds?
>
For the first two, yes.
> e.g: "sysUpTime.0" should be the first one followed by "snmpTrapOID.0"
> then the actual data varbinds
hi,
Is it necessary to maintain any specific order in SNMP TRAP for varbinds?
e.g: "sysUpTime.0" should be the first one followed by "snmpTrapOID.0" then
the actual data varbinds.
*Detailed Varbinds:*
User Datagram Protocol, Src Port: 44724, Dst Port: 162
Simple Network
Hi All
My C++ application running(on windows-64 bit application with Apache 2.4
(Daemon )and this application support only SNMP V1 V2 using net-snmp API our
C++ application get snmp call (for SNMPGET,SNMP walk using Windows OS provided
SNMP Service using ExtensionAgents C:\Windows\system32
g definition of "small" has certainly increased in size over time
with the continued increase of storage/memory availability in even the
smallest devices.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
___
lti-threaded then it seems like your hands are tied? I
certainly won't object if nothing changes.
On Mon, Oct 18, 2021 at 10:30 AM Wes Hardaker
wrote:
>
> Neil Mckee writes:
>
> > This may have been covered many times before, but just in case it
> > helps someone, here is
Neil Mckee writes:
> This may have been covered many times before, but just in case it
> helps someone, here is a summary of my experience with using net-snmp
> in a large network.
Thank you for the very useful list of changes.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to net-sn
And then set
your MIBS environment variable to be correct to. So putting it in
/usr/local/share/snmp/mibs was the right first start, but you also need
to set the MIBS environment variable to be "+PERSONAL-MIB" or whatever
you called it (note you need the leading +)
--
Wes Hardaker
Plea
IB located in /usr/local/share/snmp/mibs and my .c/.h
files in /agent/mibgroup/personal-mib/. The configure line I used was
./configure -with-mib-modules="personal-mib/personal" -disable-embedded-perl
-without-perl-modules. I have been able to compile and run the same .c/.h files
on
This may have been covered many times before, but just in case it
helps someone, here is a summary of my experience with using net-snmp
in a large network. Specifically, I use it to talk to thousands of
SNMPv2 and SNMPv3 agents using just one UDP socket in a process that
runs continuously.
The
Hi Olivier,
As RHEL maintainer of net-snmp, I can only advise you to check whether
you're using the up to date version of net-snmp in RHEL-7
(net-snmp-5.7.2-49.1).
I was able to find some modifications in netsnmp_tdomain_transport_full
method, that was backported from the upstream commit
Hi SNMP Team,
We integrated SNMP 5.7.3 library as part of our software (libsnmpsl and
libpasnmpmgr). We are running on REHL 7 x86 64 bits.
One of our partner reported us that they caught a signal 6 during the
initialization of SNMP V3 session.
Here is the stack trace fwe got in our product that
We have a SNMP running with Sub-agents and are using the "snmp_select_info"
call to find the number of file descriptors and then
perform a select call to get the data. However, when we run a OMAPI thread that
communicates with a DHCP server over TCP connection to get lease inform
ue, please?
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/16888540/
>
It works, thank you, -R
___
Net-snmp-coders mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-coders
Dear all,
I found this suggestion about the issue in the object and I applied it in
a newer version but it did not work. Could you help me to address
this issue, please?
https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/mailman/message/16888540/
AP> Is it possible for net-snmp to exec the script on each
"Srilatha Devineni (sdevinen) via Net-snmp-coders"
writes:
> I installed 5.9.1 net-snmp and I see there is no support for AES
AES requires OpenSSL to be installed when Net-SNMP is compiled. Use the
--with-openssl flag to point to the path where it is installed if it
couldn&#
On Mon, 19 Jul 2021, 20:28 Roberto A. Foglietta, <
[email protected]> wrote:
> I have been reported that the bottleneck is due to the single-thread
> nature of SNMP.
> The bottleneck is about 1 SNMP call served per second.
>
That sounds like asynchronous SNMP calls
Hi All,
I am experiencing a bottleneck in managing the SNMP calls when they have a
flow peak.
I have been reported that the bottleneck is due to the single-thread
nature of SNMP.
The bottleneck is about 1 SNMP call served per second.
Do you anyone considered to have a multi-thread SNMP
Hi Developers,
I installed 5.9.1 net-snmp and I see there is no support for AES
I wonder , why the latest version doesn’tt have support for AES
I don’t think that I missed any config.
SDEVINEN-M-V0LX:net-snmp-5.9.1 sdevinen$ snmpwalk -v3 -l authPriv -u
authPriv-sha-aes -a SHA -A PASSWORD1
al hack that would
> get
> around the issue. This was not an issue in older versions of snmp libraries
> (namely
> we’ve used snmp 5.5). We do not use libnetsnmpmibs or libnetsnmptrapd. If
> there is a
> way to exclude them from being built that would also solve the issue.
Is ther
and, Nicholas
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
>
> We would like to compile the net snmp 5.8 libs (
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8/net-snmp-5.8.tar.gz/download)
> without any crypto/ssl support whatsoever. Currently I have tried the
> following configure o
Hello,
We would like to compile the net snmp 5.8 libs
(https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.8/net-snmp-5.8.tar.gz/download)
without any crypto/ssl support whatsoever. Currently I have tried the
following configure options:
'--disable-embedded
. I need to extend snmpd with a new custom MIB
> module.
> I have NET-SNMP version 5.5 on Redhat, I would implement perl API, using
> NetSNMP::agent.
> Hereby, the steps I've done:
>
> - /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
> #sec.name sourcecommunity
> com
Hi all,
I'm a newbie with AgentX. I need to extend snmpd with a new custom MIB
module.
I have NET-SNMP version 5.5 on Redhat, I would implement perl API, using
NetSNMP::agent.
Hereby, the steps I've done:
- /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
#sec.name sourcecommunity
com2sec not
nfo->getMode() == MODE_SET_ACTION) {
> # ... (or use the value)
> $value = $request->getValue();
> }
You're setting the $value variable but never using it again -- you would
need to update the $defa
Hi, Can anyone help me?
I'm a newbie with AgentX. I need to extend snmpd with a new custom MIB
module.
I have NET-SNMP version 5.5 on Redhat, I would implement perl API, using
NetSNMP::agent.
Hereby, the steps I've done:
- /etc/snmp/snmpd.conf
#sec.name source
I've pushed Net-SNMP 5.9.1.rc1. This means we're now in the
release-candidate cycle which requires request-for-vote posts to this
list in order to approve any additional changes before the final release
(with a delta of at least people voting positively for any change).
https://sourc
It was produced from the V5-9-patches branch and is available here:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.9.1-pre-releases/
Please take it for a test drive and see how it fairs.
--
Wes Hardaker
Please mail all replies to [email protected]
1 - 100 of 4650 matches
Mail list logo
