.1.6.3.10.1.1.2 0xb1ccc82374fba0f25dc2dcca2eadc5ad .1.3.6.1.6.3.10.1.2.2
0xb1ccc82374fba0f25dc2dcca2eadc5ad 0x
When I want to clone this user (using the following command : ./snmpusm -v3 -l
authPriv -u testl3 -a MD5 -A unephrase -x DES -X unephrase 198.18.104.143
create usercloned testl3) I get the following error: Error in
Hi Coders,
I've uncovered an issue with our code base when using posix_spawn to create
users for snmp. The below is a snippet of our code.
sprintf_s(strIn, sizeof(strIn), "/usr/local/bin/snmpusm -n %c%c -v3 -u %s -l
authNoPriv -a MD5 -A %s localhost
Josef Ridky writes:
> I would like to know, if is there any utility for create/modify/delete
> user for snmptrapd like there is snmpusm for snmpd.
> The only way how to create snmptrapd user is write proper command to
> /etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf file and for removing snmptrapd user
Hi,
I would like to know, if is there any utility for create/modify/delete user for
snmptrapd like there is snmpusm for snmpd.
The only way how to create snmptrapd user is write proper command to
/etc/snmp/snmptrapd.conf file and for removing snmptrapd user I have to remove
proper line from
Hi Coders,
I have a query.
Can we create or delete trap users using snmpusm create and delete commands?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Madhu
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
eng
On Fri, 2011-01-07 at 14:13 -0800, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:46:11 +0100 Bart wrote:
> BVA> Are the original transport data structure and its copy modified
> BVA> independently of each other - if these are ever modified ? If not, a
> BVA> possible alternative is to use reference c
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:46:11 +0100 Bart wrote:
BVA> Are the original transport data structure and its copy modified
BVA> independently of each other - if these are ever modified ? If not, a
BVA> possible alternative is to use reference counting instead of copying.
RS> I believe Wes added the copy
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 18:46:11 +0100 Bart wrote:
BVA> Are the original transport data structure and its copy modified
BVA> independently of each other - if these are ever modified ? If not, a
BVA> possible alternative is to use reference counting instead of copying.
I believe Wes added the copy funct
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:49 AM, Robert Story wrote:
> On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:07:16 +0100 Magnus wrote:
> MF> What is the correct semantics of a copy of a transport?
> MF>
> MF> What happens if I close the copy? The original?
>
> Good point. One of them will be left with a file descriptor that is
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 23:07:16 +0100 Magnus wrote:
MF> What is the correct semantics of a copy of a transport?
MF>
MF> What happens if I close the copy? The original?
Good point. One of them will be left with a file descriptor that is no longer
valid. If some other tranport then opens a socket, the
On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 21:24 +0100, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Bart Van Assche
> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently tests T053 and T110 started to fail (Linux and
> Cygwin) in a similar fashion: snmp{trap}d.log shows that a
> response ha
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently tests T053 and T110 started to fail (Linux and Cygwin) in a
> similar fashion: snmp{trap}d.log shows that a response has been sent but the
> client that sent the request did not receive the response.
>
> Has anyone already
> On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:30:57 +0200, Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
TA> If we can't come up with a fix in a reasonable time frame, I propose to
TA> back out the patch.
Reverted.
--
Wes Hardaker
Sparta, Inc.
---
Thank you for writing us.
Elettronika will be on holiday until 25/08/08, as such we cannot answer now to
your e-mail, but we will as soon as we come back.
Grazie per aver scritto all'Elettronika.
Saremo in vacanza fino al 25/01/08, pertanto risponderemo alla Vs. mail al
nostro rientro.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Revision: 17157
> http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=17157&view=rev
> Author: hardaker
> Date: 2008-08-15 13:45:20 + (Fri, 15 Aug 2008)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> NEWS: snmpusm: PATCH: 1591355: fro
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2008 16:58:53 +0530, anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
a> Kindly let me know if there is any patch or an add on available that
a> supplies support for localized Key changes in 5.1.4.(-Ck Option).
You might be able to copy a recent apps/snmpusm.c file to the older
5.1.4 line of
Hi All
I have been facing issues with versions 5.2.4,5.3.2 and 5.4.1 for the past
few days.
All these versions have support for -Ck Option in snmpusm command for
changing the passphrases to localized keys directly using 0x in front of the
localized key.
Similarly we can also create the SNMP user
> "TA" == Thomas Anders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TA> The change to trunk/net-snmp/apps/snmpusm.c seems to be related to patch
TA> 1591355, not 1645698. It also breaks test #20. I assume it went in by
TA> accident. I've backed it out in r16384.
Thanks. My patme script wasn't doing a proper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Revision: 16373
> http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/net-snmp/?rev=16373&view=rev
> Author: hardaker
> Date: 2007-05-16 21:39:31 -0700 (Wed, 16 May 2007)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> CHANGES: snmplib: patch: 1645698: fix 64-bit signed integer encodi
To the net-snmp patch tracker admin,
By mistake, I submitted twice the snmpusm application patch, do
you mind deleting/rejecting one of them? Preferable the one that was
submitted as nobody.
Thanks, and sorry about that.
Pablo
Passera Pablo-APP015 wrote:
> I'm attaching the proposed patch for snmpusm. The version I'm
> comparing to is 5.3.0.1
Thanks. Can you post this to the patch tracker
(www.net-snmp.org/patches), please?
+Thomas
--
Thomas Anders (thomas.anders
>>>>> "PP" == Passera Pablo-APP writes:
PP> My proposal for this is to add a new option to the snmpusm
PP> application.
The new feature looks like a good and well-needed one. Can you please
upload it to http://www.net-snmp.org/patches as well to make sure w
Hi,
I have two proposals for the snmpusnm.
First, with the current snmpusm implementation you cannot clone
a user with a different engineID than the template, for instance, if you
use:
./snmpusm -v 3 -u Admin -l authPriv -a SHA -A Test1 -x AES -X Test1
localhost -CE
Thomas,
when I use the -CE option with the snmpusm application it seems
that it has to be an user with that engineID to clone from when I'm
creating a new user. Is that correct or I'm not using correctly the -CE
option?
Thanks,
Pablo
> -Original Message-
> From:
Passera Pablo-APP015 wrote:
> One question about this application, Is it possible to
> clone/create an user with an engineID different than the one in the
> agent?
snmpusm in net-snmp 5.3 and later supports a "-CE " option for
exactly this purpose.
+Thomas
Hi everybody,
One question about this application, Is it possible to
clone/create an user with an engineID different than the one in the
agent? Or this can only be done adding the user in the persistency file?
Thanks,
Pablo
-
> On Mon, 8 May 2006 15:33:52 +0530, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
kanakamahesh> Is it the limitation of net-snmp for not persisting
kanakamahesh> changed dh-keys in snmpd.conf?
No, the keys should definitely be stored in the snmpd.conf file after
a key change.Did you happen to do a kill -9 o
Hi,
I changed Auth/Priv DH
keys using snmpusm. It displayed
the changed authentication/privacy keys on the console after snmpusm for respective
USM user.
I was not sure whether
the changed keys will persist in /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf file? To verify this
usecase, I restarted the
sers.
sasson> Is there any way around this besides snmpusm?
The usmUser line is actually fairly decipherable. It is not
encrypted, it is only in hex. The second hex string (0x...) in the
line is actually the user name. It's fairly easy to convert any ascii
user name to hex and chec
Title: Managing SNMPv3 passwords without snmpusm.
Hi all, I have a question that relates to ease of use (ease of management) of SNMPv3 passwords.
Every administrator would like to change some of the passwords of the users accessing the SNMPv3 agent.
Lets say that the situation is that there
On Fri, 2005-10-21 at 11:59 +0200, Thomas Anders wrote:
> snmpusm currently uses the contextEngineID of the agent (either
> probed or specified via -E) to build the index for the usmUserTable.
> There IMHO should be a new (optional) flag/parameter to snmpusm to
> specify this usm
-Coders,
snmpusm currently uses the contextEngineID of the agent (either probed
or specified via -E) to build the index for the usmUserTable. However,
as outlined in Bug #1333655
(http://sf.net/support/tracker.php?aid=1333655), this isn't always
appropriate, e.g. when manipul
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 14:22 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Can we run the snmpusm tool by logging into a device (having
> linux OS ) through telnet for changing the privacy key and auth key?
Yes.
(Though I hope you mean "ssh" rather than
Hi
Can we run the snmpusm tool by
logging into a device (having linux OS ) through telnet for changing the
privacy key and auth key?
With regards,
Sam
Amber Gupta wrote:
Actually I looked at your patch earlier and had same opinion that you
are trying yo provide solution for same.
The problem with me is that I am relatively new to net-snmp and still do
not know how patch works..Do I need to just copy file an compile?
Get the patch (say: file.d
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas
Anders
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 6:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SNMPUSM user are not recognized after agent restart
Amber Gupta wrote:
> I think I know what the problem is . It is
Amber Gupta wrote:
I think I know what the problem is . It is so happening that after every
restart engineID is getting changed .
Suspiciously sounds like what I've been describing in patch
[ 1042139 ] engineID/oldEngineID persistency fix
http://sf.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1042139
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wes
Hardaker
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 12:24 PM
To: Amber Gupta
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SNMPUSM user are not recognized after agent restart
>>>>> On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:47:03 -0400, "Amber G
> On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 18:47:03 -0400, "Amber Gupta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Amber> I am not able to understand why user is not getting
Amber> recognized. I am expecting snmpd to reread already stored users
Amber> correctly so that after agent restart I need not re-create
Amber> them. Can anyo
Hi Wes
I am facing this strange problem of usm user not getting recognized
after agent boot.Here are the steps that I am following .
SNMP_PERSISTENT_FILE set to /var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf
SNMPCONFPATH set to /etc/snmp,/var/net-snmp
/var/net-snmp/snmpd.conf contains following line
createUser
> On Tue, 13 Jul 2004 23:22:04 +0530, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Jeeru> Reason: authorizationError (access denied to that object)
That error means you didn't proprly give access to your new user to
let them do things. You either need to use the snmpvacm to add
authorization rights for your us
Title: Message
Is there a mechanism
using the snmpusm command for one user (an admin, for example) to set the keys
for a different user? I've been looking though usmuser.c, and it looks
like to me that it only sets the key for the user in session.securityName.
Thanks,
Michael
Alex
Hi All,
I have found some strange problem with SNMPUSM - I am not sure as
whether it could be a problem in my configuration!
I am using net-snmp ver 5.1 running on RedHat Linux 7.2 Kernel is 2.4.7
Here is the problem description:
I FIRST CREATE A DEFAULT SNMPv3 USER
43 matches
Mail list logo
