Hi,
I am using net-snmp5.7.3 agent. I am using USM user table to create 2nd and
3rd Snmpv3 user.
The user is getting created successful and I am able to contact using the
new user.
However these user accounts are not persistent and they get cleared off
after power cycle.
Is there anyway to make
> -Original Message-
> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, 22 September 2011 4:17 a.m.
> To: Harvey Shepherd
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: USM Users
>
> >>>>> On Thu, 15 S
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 23:06:38 +, Harvey Shepherd
> said:
HS> Does anyone know if there is a similar exclusion within the SNMP agent
HS> itself to prevent community based access to objects in snmpUsmMIB? In
HS> other words, can new SNMPv3 users be defined via SNMPv1 or v2c using
HS>
Hi All,
I see from the man page for the snmpusm application, that usage is limited to
the SNMPv3 protocol (which makes sense):
"Manipulating the usmUserTable using this command can only be done using
SNMPv3. This command will not work with the community-based versions, even if
they have write
On 19 July 2010 13:32, Lewis Adam-VNQM87 wrote:
> Okay. Had a quick look at the patches and couldn't see anything. What's
> the best way of picking up the official fix?
See
http://net-snmp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/net-snmp?view=revision&revision=19225
Dave
--
Robert Story wrote:
> It is a bug, and I saw that Wes just got through checking in a fix.
Thanks for
> prodding us. :-)
Okay. Had a quick look at the patches and couldn't see anything. What's
the best way of picking up the official fix?
Adam.
-
On Tue, 13 Jul 2010 18:02:42 +0100 Lewis wrote:
LAV> looking at usm_process_in_msg() in snmpusm.c [net-snmp-5.5], there does
LAV> not seem to be code to specifically reject a request if the associated
LAV> user does not have a row status of RS_ACTIVE. The function
LAV> usm_check_secLevel() returns
looking at usm_process_in_msg() in snmpusm.c [net-snmp-5.5], there does
not seem to be code to specifically reject a request if the associated
user does not have a row status of RS_ACTIVE. The function
usm_check_secLevel() returns -1 in this case but the error code is
ignored. Is this deliberate or
The usmUser lines are now appearing in the persistent file. It seems to
require a SIGHUP signal to the agent in order to get the cached
usmUserTable to be written out. Rebooting the system (obviously?) did
not give the agent enough time, or maybe the SIGTERM handler does not
cause the write a
Rob Garcelon wrote;
> I have created USM users with the following commands, invoked on the
> local system where the agent is running. I expect them to survive a
> reboot, by being written to the persistent/snmpd.conf file. There are
> fixed users defined in the regular snmpd.conf
I have created USM users with the following commands, invoked on the
local system where the agent is running. I expect them to survive a
reboot, by being written to the persistent/snmpd.conf file. There are
fixed users defined in the regular snmpd.conf, to be used as clone targets.
snmpusm
11 matches
Mail list logo
