Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-16 Thread Andy Smith
Alex Burger wrote: Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:49:41 -0500 Alex wrote: AB> I still think it's unreasonable to have to tailor to users of old AB> compilers when the fix is for the user is to download a *FREE* SDK from AB> Microsoft. That is an extra library to be linked in

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-16 Thread Coders
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:49:41 -0500 Alex wrote: AB> I still think it's unreasonable to have to tailor to users of old AB> compilers when the fix is for the user is to download a *FREE* SDK from AB> Microsoft. That is an extra library to be linked in, increasing agent size for someone who may be t

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-16 Thread Alex Burger
Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:49:41 -0500 Alex wrote: AB> I still think it's unreasonable to have to tailor to users of old AB> compilers when the fix is for the user is to download a *FREE* SDK from AB> Microsoft. That is an extra library to be linked in, increasing agent

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-10 Thread Alex Burger
Robert Story (Coders) wrote: On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 12:32:30 -0500 Alex wrote: AB> To compile without the SDK we either need to find functions that don't rely AB> on the SDK, or just leave it broken in the nonSDK version. Exactly. This is the way all dependencies work, and for the most part we allow u

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-10 Thread Alex Burger
Andy Smith wrote: Alex Burger wrote: Does anyone have an objection to making the Platform SDK a *requirement* to compile under Windows? This would eliminate the problems we are starting to see with code that expects the SDK to be installed. I can only see the problem getting worse in the futur

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-09 Thread Alex Burger
Does anyone have an objection to making the Platform SDK a *requirement* to compile under Windows? This would eliminate the problems we are starting to see with code that expects the SDK to be installed. I can only see the problem getting worse in the future as we start to add more Windows sp

Re: Win32 SDK

2004-12-02 Thread Andy Smith
Alex Burger wrote: Hi Andy. There are now two known issues with compiling 5.2 without the SDK installed. The first is that win32\net-snmp\net-snmp-config.h contains: #define HAVE_SOCKLEN_T 1 which should only be defined if the Platform SDK is installed. The second is in agent\mibgroup\mibII\syste

Win32 SDK

2004-11-30 Thread Alex Burger
Hi Andy. There are now two known issues with compiling 5.2 without the SDK installed. The first is that win32\net-snmp\net-snmp-config.h contains: #define HAVE_SOCKLEN_T 1 which should only be defined if the Platform SDK is installed. The second is in agent\mibgroup\mibII\system_mib.c. wProductTyp