Fairly sure this is the patch I submitted, if so, thanks for
considering it and please see my comments inline
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Niels Baggesen
wrote:
> The configure test for pcre requires that you explicitly configure
> --without-pcre if you are on a system without pcre support. Is
Magnus Fromreide writes:
> On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:49:54PM +0200, Niels Baggesen wrote:
>> The configure test for pcre requires that you explicitly configure
>> --without-pcre if you are on a system without pcre support. Isn't this a
>> bit overreacting?
>
> I have noticed that as well but n
On Mon, Aug 06, 2012 at 07:49:54PM +0200, Niels Baggesen wrote:
> The configure test for pcre requires that you explicitly configure
> --without-pcre if you are on a system without pcre support. Isn't this a
> bit overreacting?
I have noticed that as well but not gotten around to fix it.
> Actu
The configure test for pcre requires that you explicitly configure
--without-pcre if you are on a system without pcre support. Isn't this a
bit overreacting?
Actually, are there any reason to go for pcre for this, adding a
dependency that is not standard on BSD or Solaris (and probably AIX and
