Jose Roberto Fernandez Anahia writes:
> I observed that my funcion My_Get_Table(struct variable *vp, oid
> *name, size_t *length, int exact, size_t *var_len, WriteMethod
> **write_method)
> is called much more than 5 (five) 5 times!!!
The upper code doesn't know how many entries you have, so it
Jose Roberto Fernandez Anahia writes:
> I observed that my funcion My_Get_Table(struct variable *vp, oid
> *name, size_t *length, int exact, size_t *var_len, WriteMethod
> **write_method)
> is called much more than 5 (five) 5 times!!!
The upper code doesn't know how many entries you have, so it
1.1.1.5.32 is also a table
I tried to debug the agent_check_and_process() function call sequence until the
call of the helper function that effectively calls my the function I wrote to
manipulate my MIB "My_Get_table()" but I do not understand what is checked to
stop my function from being called, rega
AIN AAIN AGAIN and AGAIN my fuction My_Get_Table()
returns NULL as return of header_simple_table() NOW stop!!!
Is this normal behaviour for snmpwalk and snmpbulkwalk?
Why My_Get_Table() do not stopped to be called after return the first NULL by
header_simple_table()?
This same behaviour is
Am 25.08.2017 20:09, schrieb Jeff Gehlbach:
On 08/25/2017 12:22 PM, michael-dev wrote:
When using snmpbulkwalk to fetch all OIDs from my Aruba Switch,
snmpbulkwalk complains about non-increasing OIDs.
Ignoring using -Cc makes snmpbulkwalk loop forever.
I hope you will also report this problem
On 08/25/2017 12:22 PM, michael-dev wrote:
> When using snmpbulkwalk to fetch all OIDs from my Aruba Switch,
> snmpbulkwalk complains about non-increasing OIDs.
> Ignoring using -Cc makes snmpbulkwalk loop forever.
I hope you will also report this problem to Aruba as a bug. It would be
When using snmpbulkwalk to fetch all OIDs from my Aruba Switch,
snmpbulkwalk complains about non-increasing OIDs.
Ignoring using -Cc makes snmpbulkwalk loop forever.
Therefore I'd like to ignore a specific (Sub-)Subtree that cannot be
walked.
This patch adds -Ce cmdline opti
2009/11/19 Reinaldo Moodey :
> How do I execute an snmpbulkwalk command. I put the OIDs one aftre the
> other, but it only give response to the fist OID and ignores the others.
That's right.
snmpbulkwalk is a version of the snmpwalk command,
which inherently takes a single sta
How do I execute an snmpbulkwalk command. I put the OIDs one aftre the
other, but it only give response to the fist OID and ignores the others.
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
Thanks.
- Jerry
-Original Message-
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Dave Shield
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2009 12:32 AM
To: Jerry Huang (jerhuang)
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: snmpbulkwalk syntax
2009/11/9
2009/11/9 Jerry Huang (jerhuang) :
> When I try the following snmpbulkwalk command, I will get "No Such
> Instance" message.
>
> [jerhu...@snmplab-linux2 ~/performance_extra]$ snmpbulkwalk -v2c -c public
> 172.28.83.92 -Cr80 vtpVlanState.1.100
> CISCO-VTP-MIB::
Hi, David:
When I try the following snmpbulkwalk command, I will get "No Such Instance"
message.
[jerhu...@snmplab-linux2 ~/performance_extra]$ snmpbulkwalk -v2c -c public
172.28.83.92 -Cr80 vtpVlanState.1.100
CISCO-VTP-MIB::vtpVlanState.1.100 = No Such Instance currently exis
2009/10/28 Jerry Huang (jerhuang) :
> I have the following command syntax works fine for "getbulk from
> snmpResearch":
>
> getbulk -v2c 172.28.83.100 public 0 1000 vtpVlanState.1.300
>
> What is the corresponding for "snmpbulkwalk"?
The simple
Hi, Can you show me the correct syntax for snmpbulkwalk?
I have the following command syntax works fine for "getbulk from
snmpResearch":
getbulk -v2c 172.28.83.100 public 0 1000 vtpVlanState.1.300
What is the corresponding for "snmpbulkwalk"?
Tha
my snmpbulkwalk.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# snmpbulkwalk 192.168.200.254 -v 2c -c private
IF-MIB::ifDescr
IF-MIB::ifDescr.1 = STRING: lo
IF-MIB::ifDescr.2 = STRING: eth51
IF-MIB::ifDescr.3 = STRING: eth52
IF-MIB::ifDescr.4 = STRING: eth01
IF-MIB::ifDescr.5 = STRING: eth02
IF-MIB
mand-specific option (hence the '-C'), and only applies
to snmpbulkwalk. Other commands either won't understand '-Cr' at
all, or will interpret it differently.
Dave
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. In
On 10/01/07, Breton, Marc-André <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When using snmpbulkwalk, I saw that only 10 values were included per
> responding packet. I'd like to know if there's a way to manually increase
> that limit. I searched in the options but I didn't find a
Hello,
When using snmpbulkwalk, I saw that only 10 values were included per responding
packet. I'd like to know if there's a way to manually increase that limit. I
searched in the options but I didn't find a way to change this parameter. I'd
like to change it to dec
18 matches
Mail list logo
