RE: vacm notification access

2007-04-09 Thread Passera Pablo-APP015
: Wes Hardaker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 2:05 PM > To: Dave Shield > Cc: Wes Hardaker; Passera Pablo-APP015; > net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: vacm notification access > > >>>>> "DS" == Dave Shiel

Re: vacm notification access

2007-04-06 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> We'll need to tread carefully, though. There will be DS> hundreds of existing installations that are working quite DS> happily, and we'll need to ensure that a default config DS> continues to send traps. DS> (I realise that such an appro

Re: vacm notification access

2007-04-04 Thread Dave Shield
On 03/04/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > DS> I'm pretty sure that the vacmNotifyView is not actually consulted > DS> when generating notifications. > > Ugh. We need to add that. OK - I've added that to the project tracker. W

Re: vacm notification access

2007-04-03 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "DS" == Dave Shield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: DS> I'm pretty sure that the vacmNotifyView is not actually consulted DS> when generating notifications. Ugh. We need to add that. (it was the following grep that led me to believe it might be without checking further...) snmpNotifyTable.c:

Re: vacm notification access

2007-04-03 Thread Dave Shield
On 03/04/07, Passera Pablo-APP015 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think the checking is not implemented > or > is not working properly. I looked at the code and I could not find any > part where the checking was being performed. Any clue? I agree. I don't thi

RE: vacm notification access

2007-04-03 Thread Passera Pablo-APP015
Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Shield > Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 12:31 PM > To: Passera Pablo-APP015; Wes Hardaker > Cc: net-snmp-coders@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: vacm notification access > > On 30/03/07

Re: vacm notification access

2007-04-02 Thread Dave Shield
On 30/03/07, Wes Hardaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "PP" == Passera Pablo-APP writes: > > PP> I have a question related to how VACM is implemented in the > PP> agent. Is the notify-view parameter in the access token being used when > PP> the agent generates a notification? > > It should b

Re: vacm notification access

2007-03-30 Thread Wes Hardaker
> "PP" == Passera Pablo-APP writes: PP> I have a question related to how VACM is implemented in the PP> agent. Is the notify-view parameter in the access token being used when PP> the agent generates a notification? It should be, yes. -- Wes Hardaker Sparta, Inc. --

vacm notification access

2007-03-29 Thread Passera Pablo-APP015
Hi, I have a question related to how VACM is implemented in the agent. Is the notify-view parameter in the access token being used when the agent generates a notification? Thanks, Pablo - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Inf