On 24 May 2010 05:11, Omer Zak wrote:
> 2. Is anyone else in favor of forking the Net-SNMP project over the
> comments issue?
If you wish to fork off a separate project based on the current
Net-SNMP code - you are, of course, perfectly free to do so.
In many ways, I would welcome such a move -
Hello Wes,
"make test" without TAP::Harness is broken in several ways. The output I get
is:
fulltests/SNMPv3 get using MD5/noPriv of .1.3.6.1.2.1.1.3.0.t: No such file
or directory at ./RUNFULLTESTS line 419.
make[1]: *** [test] Error 2
make: *** [test] Error 2
While run_olducd was renamed to ol
We users could actually step up more and contribute more
documentation; I have been on this long enough to see the help that
dave, wes and other long time members give. I am amazed at how many
people are apparently thrown into SNMP development full bore who have
had no company training nor mentori
Hello,
The patch below fixes the circular dependency between libnetsnmphelpers and
libnetsnmpagent. It does this by removing the netsnmp_init_helpers() call
from init_agent() and by adding an explicit call to netsnmp_init_helpers()
after every call to init_agent(). This is a backwards incompatible
www.qqa4.MEDICINE-CO.com
_
Climate, controversies and the changing signatures of nature
http://green.in.msn.com/--
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 07:14:05 -0400, Max
> said:
M> How about some of us contribute to some higher level documentation,
M> like wes suggests, as we learn and use the agent?
Thanks for the suggestion and/or offer Max. It would certainly be
helpful to have more people contribute to the
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 14:08:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche
> said:
BVA> The patch below fixes the circular dependency between libnetsnmphelpers and
BVA> libnetsnmpagent.
That one call is the only dependency? (which surprises me in itself).
Sigh... If we go that route it certainly warrants
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Wes Hardaker <
harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 May 2010 14:08:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche <
> bvanass...@acm.org> said:
>
> BVA> The patch below fixes the circular dependency between
> libnetsnmphelpers and
> BVA> libnetsnmpagent.
>
> That o
On Mon, 2010-05-24 at 20:10 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>
> An alternative is the patch below. init_agent() still calls
> netsnmp_init_helpers(), but only if libnetsnmphelpers.so has been
> loaded before libnetsnmpagent.so. This has been realized by adding a
> shared-library initialization func
Bart Van Assche wrote:
> The patch below fixes the circular dependency between libnetsnmphelpers
> and libnetsnmpagent. It does this by removing the netsnmp_init_helpers()
> call from init_agent() and by adding an explicit call to
> netsnmp_init_helpers() after every call to init_agent(). This is a
Thank you for your time in responding to my question; at our company,
we believe in heavily documenting all code before it can be accepted
(if that means that people need to work late to get it in, they do
^_^). One of the things that we've found is that what is easy and
obvious today is crazy and
> On Mon, 24 May 2010 18:01:49 -0400, Doug Manley
> said:
DM> Thank you for your time in responding to my question; at our company,
DM> we believe in heavily documenting all code before it can be accepted
DM> (if that means that people need to work late to get it in, they do
DM> ^_^). O
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:47 PM, Thomas Anders wrote:
> Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > The patch below fixes the circular dependency between libnetsnmphelpers
> > and libnetsnmpagent. It does this by removing the netsnmp_init_helpers()
> > call from init_agent() and by adding an explicit call to
> >
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Wes Hardaker <
harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 May 2010 14:08:02 +0200, Bart Van Assche <
> bvanass...@acm.org> said:
>
> BVA> The patch below fixes the circular dependency between
> libnetsnmphelpers and
> BVA> libnetsnmpagent.
>
> That o
14 matches
Mail list logo
