Re: Fwd: SF.net SVN: net-snmp:[19116]

2010-06-30 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 12:30 AM, Thomas Anders < thomas.and...@blue-cable.de> wrote: > Bart Van Assche wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Thomas Anders > > mailto:thomas.and...@blue-cable.de>> > wrote: > > Where exactly do you propose to add > > #include ? > > > > The safest pla

[5.6.pre1] missing patch for python module

2010-06-30 Thread Diego Billi
Several months ago i submitted a patch to the bug track. The patch fixed a segmentation fault problem and wrong handling of error messages. You can see the details here: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2952766&group_id=12694&atid=112694 I've been using a netsnmp 5.5 pa

How to set the u_int64_t value to counter64 type.

2010-06-30 Thread Prakash
Hi all, I am using NET-SNMP 5.4.2.1 and created template code using table_data handler. I set the currentMsgID type as counter64 to handle u_int64_t. How to set convert the u_int64_t to counter64 or U64. Is there any other type to handle u_int64_t instead of using counter64 ?. SAMPLE CO

Re: How to set the u_int64_t value to counter64 type.

2010-06-30 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:33:04 +0530, "Prakash" > said: P> How to set convert the u_int64_t to counter64 or U64. The easiest way is to simply copy the two 32bit components of the uint64 into the counter64 structure's 'high' and 'low' elements. P> Is there any other type to handle u_in

Re: [5.6.pre1] missing patch for python module

2010-06-30 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:45:55 +0200, Diego Billi said: DB> Is this patch going to be included in the new 5.6 release? The SVN DB> sources do not contain the patch. I'm behind in getting to applying all the needed patches, and I apologize for that. I intend to review all the outstanding pat

Re: [5.6.pre1] missing patch for python module

2010-06-30 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Wes Hardaker < harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 12:45:55 +0200, Diego Billi > said: > > DB> Is this patch going to be included in the new 5.6 release? The SVN > DB> sources do not contain the patch. > > I'm behind in getting to ap

Re: [5.6.pre1] missing patch for python module

2010-06-30 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:44:20 +0200, Bart Van Assche > said: BVA> What are the criteria for a prerelease ? I assume that the source BVA> code should at least build ? Currently both the MinGW and the MSVC BVA> builds are broken, and two Cygwin regression tests fail. They should definite

Re: [5.6.pre1] missing patch for python module

2010-06-30 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:44:20 +0200, Bart Van Assche > said: BVA> What are the criteria for a prerelease ? I assume that the source code BVA> should at least build ? Currently both the MinGW and the MSVC builds are BVA> broken, and two Cygwin regression tests fail. The last message I c

5.6.pre2 available for testing

2010-06-30 Thread Wes Hardaker
I've placed Net-SNMP 5.6.pre2 up for testing: https://sourceforge.net/projects/net-snmp/files/net-snmp/5.6-pre-releases/ There are a number of important changes since the last pre-release, and they're marked with a ! below in the NEWS section: *5.6* all: - Implemented the SNMP over

Re: [5.6.pre1] missing patch for python module

2010-06-30 Thread Bart Van Assche
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:52 AM, Wes Hardaker < harda...@users.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2010 18:44:20 +0200, Bart Van Assche < > bvanass...@acm.org> said: > > BVA> What are the criteria for a prerelease ? I assume that the source code > BVA> should at least build ? Currently