API of send Trapv1

2010-10-05 Thread 생각하기
 Hello   I want to send Trapv1 The trap format is below   Figure 279: SNMP Version 1 (SNMPv1) Trap-PDU Format     I find the API that send SNMPTrapv1.   I realize that send_easy_trap and netsnmp_send_trap and send_enterprise_trap_var are not proper to send SNMPv1 Tr

Re: API of send Trapv1

2010-10-05 Thread Dave Shield
2010/10/5 생각하기 > I want to send Trapv1 From the SNMP agent, or from an application? > I realize that send_easy_trap and netsnmp_send_trap and > send_enterprise_trap_var > are not proper to send SNMPv1 Trap.. You realise incorrectly. If you are sending notifications from within the agent, you

Re: send send_easy_trap

2010-10-05 Thread Dave Shield
2010/10/5 생각하기 > I 'm going to send SNMPTrapv1 use "send_easy_trap > > I can receive the SNMPv2 Trap named "notiport" > but i can't receive SNMPv1Trap using "send_easy_trap" > > what is the problem ?! From the FAQ How can I get the agent to send an SNMPv1 (or SNMPv2c) trap?

Re: CFV: IPv6 support broken for Solaris 8

2010-10-05 Thread Niels Baggesen
Den 28-09-2010 15:20, Niels Baggesen skrev: > IPv6 detection for Solaris was broken with the configure.d rewrite. > The following patch re-enables it. I count +3 (my self, Wes, Magnus), and two abstain (Dave and Bart), so I will go ahead and commit it when I have got the proper autoconf tools in

Re: CFV: IPv6 support broken for Solaris 8

2010-10-05 Thread Wes Hardaker
> On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 21:38:04 +0200, Niels Baggesen > said: NB> I count +3 (my self, Wes, Magnus), and two abstain (Dave and Bart), so I NB> will go ahead and commit it when I have got the proper autoconf tools in NB> place :-) Please do! I just got the rest of my plate cleared and

CFV: net-snmp final from trunk tomorrow (Wednesday)

2010-10-05 Thread Wes Hardaker
Right now trunk: - is missing Niels' patch to figure ipv6 detection in configure - has one documentation related patch from Dave - is otherwise == rc3 I don't think doing another rc release is worth it, even though the ipv6 change seems semi-scary. I don't think we'll get more feedback ab